[ALAC] Discussions on ALAC Positions on CCWG Recommendations

[Seun Ojedeji]

+1

Cheers!
On 3 Feb 2016 9:00 p.m., "Alan Greenberg" <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:

> One of the problems we have had is that when commenting on previous CCWG
> reports, there have been two parallel discussions, one on the ALAC list,
> and one on the IANA-Issues WG list.
>
> Currently about 1/2 of the ALAC and 9 regional leaders are not on the
> IANA-Issues list.
>
> The traffic on that list is low. In January, there were 42 messages, and
> 32 of those were related to meeting schedules, with only 10 on substance.
>
> Adding someone to the list makes it easier for them to attend a WG
> meeting, but does not imply any obligation to do so.
>
> Is there any objection if we add those people to the IANA-Issues list now?
> This would allow the important discussion on whether to ratify or not on a
> single list.
>
> We could remove those who wanted to leave once the final decision is taken
> in or before Marrakech.
>
> Alan
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki:
> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20160204/c82263bd/attachment.html>