[ALAC] Questions on Accountability Proposals

[Alan Greenberg]

Perhaps the logic is similar, but the implications if the ALAC were 
to take such a position an possibly jeopardize the accountability 
measures being adopted and thus the IANA transition are not insignificant.

Alan

At 31/05/2015 01:00 PM, Maureen Hilyard wrote:
>Not exactly opposite, Alan. Olivier did qualify his NO response with 
>" I see no particular harm in a call for something that will, 
>in  practice, likely neither work, nor ever be used. If we reach the 
>need  for legal enforceability, it means ICANN really is in 
>trouble." which prompted my "Well, What's the point.."
>
>On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 6:43 AM, Alan Greenberg 
><<mailto:alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:
>Murray, You cannot fully support the comments of Maureen and Olivier 
>because they answered exactly oppositely to Q3.
>
>Alan
>
>At 31/05/2015 12:15 PM, Murray McKercher wrote:
>>1. Yes, 2. No 3. Yes
>>
>>I fully support the comments made by Olivier and Maureen.
>>
>>Consensus consultation and transparency provide the foundation for 
>>democratic process. If ICANN is serious in its dedication to 
>>creating a democratic global governance system, then commitment to 
>>consensus consultation and transparency is key. Substantive 
>>movement towards confrontational legalistic processes may undermine 
>>the strategic goals of the organisation and the spirit to which the 
>>volunteers are committed.
>>
>>Murray McKercher
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>On Saturday, May 30, 2015 10:14 PM, Alan Greenberg 
>><<mailto:alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:
>>
>>
>>Yes, No and No.
>>
>>At 30/05/2015 10:04 PM, Alan Greenberg wrote:
>>
>> >1. Do you believe that failing anything else, we must have the
>> >ability to remove parts of or all of the Board?
>> >
>> >2. With the exception of Board member removal, do we need legal
>> >enforceability of can we rely on good faith (and Board member
>> >removal if you supported that).
>> >
>> >3. If the final CCWG proposal calls for full legal enforceability,
>> >is that sufficient reason for the ALAC to not ratify it?
>> >
>> >Alan
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>ALAC mailing list
>><mailto:ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org>ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>>
>>At-Large Online: <http://www.atlarge.icann.org/>http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>>ALAC Working Wiki: 
>><https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+>https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+ 
>>(ALAC)
>
>_______________________________________________
>ALAC mailing list
><mailto:ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org>ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
>At-Large Online: <http://www.atlarge.icann.org>http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>ALAC Working Wiki: 
><https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)>https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20150531/95d26e79/attachment.html>