<html>
<body>
Perhaps the logic is similar, but the implications if the ALAC were to
take such a position an possibly jeopardize the accountability measures
being adopted and thus the IANA transition are not
insignificant.<br><br>
Alan<br><br>
At 31/05/2015 01:00 PM, Maureen Hilyard wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">Not exactly opposite, Alan.
Olivier did qualify his NO response with " I see no particular harm
in a call for something that will, in practice, likely neither
work, nor ever be used. If we reach the need for legal
enforceability, it means ICANN really is in trouble." which prompted
my "Well, What's the point.." <br><br>
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 6:43 AM, Alan Greenberg
<<a href="mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca">alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca</a>
> wrote:<br>
<dl>
<dd>Murray, You cannot fully support the comments of Maureen and Olivier
because they answered exactly oppositely to Q3.<br><br>
<dd>Alan<br><br>
<dd>At 31/05/2015 12:15 PM, Murray McKercher wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">
<dd>1. Yes, 2. No 3. Yes<br><br>
<dd>I fully support the comments made by Olivier and Maureen. <br><br>
<dd>Consensus consultation and transparency provide the foundation for
democratic process. If ICANN is serious in its dedication to creating a
democratic global governance system, then commitment to consensus
consultation and transparency is key. Substantive movement towards
confrontational legalistic processes may undermine the strategic goals of
the organisation and the spirit to which the volunteers are
committed.<br><br>
<dd>Murray McKercher<br><br>
<br><br>
<br>
<dd><font face="Arial, Helvetica" size=2>On Saturday, May 30, 2015 10:14
PM, Alan Greenberg
<<a href="mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca">alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca</a>
> wrote:<br>
</font><br><br>
<dd>Yes, No and No.<br><br>
<dd>At 30/05/2015 10:04 PM, Alan Greenberg wrote:<br><br>
<dd>>1. Do you believe that failing anything else, we must have the
<br>
<dd>>ability to remove parts of or all of the Board?<br>
<dd>><br>
<dd>>2. With the exception of Board member removal, do we need legal
<br>
<dd>>enforceability of can we rely on good faith (and Board member
<br>
<dd>>removal if you supported that).<br>
<dd>><br>
<dd>>3. If the final CCWG proposal calls for full legal
enforceability, <br>
<dd>>is that sufficient reason for the ALAC to not ratify it?<br>
<dd>><br>
<dd>>Alan<br><br>
<dd>_______________________________________________<br>
<dd>ALAC mailing list<br>
<dd><a href="mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org">
ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org</a><br>
<dd>
<a href="https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac" eudora="autourl">
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac</a><br><br>
<dd>At-Large Online:
<a href="http://www.atlarge.icann.org/">http://www.atlarge.icann.org</a>
<br>
<dd>ALAC Working Wiki:
<a href="https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+">
https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+</a>
(ALAC)<br>
</blockquote><br>
<dd>_______________________________________________<br>
<dd>ALAC mailing list<br>
<dd><a href="mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org">
ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org</a><br>
<dd>
<a href="https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac" eudora="autourl">
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac</a><br><br>
<dd>At-Large Online:
<a href="http://www.atlarge.icann.org">http://www.atlarge.icann.org</a>
<br>
<dd>ALAC Working Wiki:
<a href="https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)">
https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)</a>
<br><br>
</dl></blockquote></body>
</html>