[ALAC] CONSENSUS CALL: Reconstitution of CROPP Review Team

Fri Mar 6 17:33:42 UTC 2015

   HI Alan,
   It is not, but that could be after the fact and not before we choose
   people. Once we select them then they will become a member of those
   groups, but to restrict the selection to have to be a member of those 2
   groups prior to selection restricts the selection.
   Judith
_________________________________________________________________________
Judith Hellerstein, Founder & CEO
Hellerstein & Associates
3001 Veazey Terrace NW, Washington DC 20008
Phone: (202) 362-5139  Skype ID: judithhellerstein
E-mail: [1]Judith at jhellerstein.com   Website: [2]www.jhellerstein.com
Linked In: [3]www.linkedin.com/in/jhellerstein/
Opening Telecom & Technology Opportunities Worldwide

   On 3/6/2015 12:29 PM, Alan Greenberg wrote:

     Is joining one of the "parent" groups really too onerous?
     Alan
     --
     Sent from my mobile. Please excuse brevity and typos.

   On March 6, 2015 10:41:36 AM EST, Judith Hellerstein
   [4]<judith at jhellerstein.com> wrote:

HI Alan,

I am not saying to put some one in a decision making role who is not active in
any committee.  I agree, I do not think this would be effective.  I am just
saying we should not have to restrict ourselves to only choosing some one who i
s
a member/participant of the Outreach and Finance and Budget. We may want to
choose some one who was an active member of another At Large working group or
Committee.  I think we should not restrict our choice to only those two
committees. If some one is active on another committee RALO leaders may want to

try and convince them to become the CROPP RT or join that committee if we think

it would be a good fit for that person.  I am just seeking to get this chance.
I
think this is also what Ali was also asking?  I really thought that this was th
e
addition was what Cheryl had put forward which is why I did not say anything in

Singapore.

Cheers!!
Judith
  ___________________________________________________________________________

Judith Hellerstein, Founder & CEO
Hellerstein & Associates
3001 Veazey Terrace NW, Washington DC 20008
Phone: (202) 362-5139  Skype ID: judithhellerstein
E-mail: [5]Judith at jhellerstein.com   Website: [6]www.jhellerstein.com
Linked In: [7]www.linkedin.com/in/jhellerstein/
Opening Telecom & Technology Opportunities Worldwide

On 3/6/2015 10:01 AM, Alan Greenberg wrote:

     Judith, It is extremely important to get new people actively
     involved. Putting someone who is NOT actively involved an has no
     history in At-Large in a decision-making role is not, in my mind,
     the way to go. More specifically, giving someone decision making
     responsibility relate d to outreach and budget when they have shown
     no interest in either is not how I, as a hopefully responsible
     manager, would choose to go. Moreover, if you read the requirements
     carefully, the person to be selected did not have to be a formal
     MEMBER of the SC, just a Participant. Both the FBSC and the planned
     O&E SC are open. All it takes to become a participant is to send an
     e-mail to Staff saying they want to be on the SC. In any case,
     please see my next message on this subject. Alan At 06/03/2015 08:24
     AM, Judith Hellerstein wrote:

     Dear Olivier, I agree with Ali. What I thought Cheryl was suggesting
     in Singapore that the RALO can select a person to be the Cropp RT
     who is not currently on the outreach or budget. We want to expand
     the pool and the best way of doing this is to find people who are
     active contributors in one other forum and get them to take on a new
     role. We need to find a way to energize people in the RALOs to take
     on new responsibilities and one way of doing this is to ask people
     who have contributed in some other groups to take on a mor active
     role and become a cropp rt. We ate not going to choose people who
     will not be good at this as in NARALO we already have had the
     experience of having a person who is not active on any committees we
     want to avoid this and at the same time get new blood and new people
     interested in becoming involved and asking them to take a job is one
     way of doing this and is why I thought Cheryl had suggested this. If
     we are restricted to choosing people who currently are on outreach
     or budget it really constricts us on who we can appoint and then
     makes us choose some one who is already acti ve and not get a way to
     get more people active in leadership roles. The CROPP RT role is an
     important role but it is not so time consuming so is a good way to
     have a past contributor at meetings and working groups, just not
     these 2 specific ones, become more active These are my thoughts
     Judith

References

   1. mailto:Judith at jhellerstein.com
   2. http://www.jhellerstein.com/
   3. http://www.linkedin.com/in/jhellerstein/
   4. mailto:judith at jhellerstein.com
   5. mailto:Judith at jhellerstein.com
   6. http://www.jhellerstein.com/
   7. http://www.linkedin.com/in/jhellerstein