[ALAC] URGENT: ALAC Review of Sensitive TLDs and necessary PICs

Alan Greenberg alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Tue Jun 16 13:52:02 UTC 2015


Not really a mistake. We just need more details!  ;-)

Alan

At 16/06/2015 09:23 AM, Alberto Soto wrote:
>Dear Alan, apologies for my mistake.
>Regards
>Alberto
>
>-----Mensaje original-----
>De: Alan Greenberg [mailto:alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca]
>Enviado el: martes, 16 de junio de 2015 10:13 a.m.
>Para: Alberto Soto; 'ALAC'
>Asunto: RE: [ALAC] URGENT: ALAC Review of Sensitive TLDs and necessary PICs
>
>Thank you Alberto.
>
>The important question here is for WHICH TLDs do we need the extra checks.
>.bank, for instance, has agreed to do those checks. We all know and accept
>that .com, .org and most ccTLDs do NOT do verifications.
>
>Alan
>
>At 16/06/2015 09:05 AM, Alberto Soto wrote:
> >I disagree with lowering the requirements of clauses 6 and 7. There is
> >identity theft and credit problems if the check can not be left until
> >after the fact and then making the complaint. It is a disservice to the
> >individual user.
> >
> >Kind regards
> >
> >Alberto Soto
> >
> >-----Mensaje original-----
> >De: alac-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> >[mailto:alac-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] En nombre de Alan
> >Greenberg Enviado el: martes, 16 de junio de 2015 02:18 a.m.
> >Para: ALAC
> >Asunto: [ALAC] URGENT: ALAC Review of Sensitive TLDs and necessary PICs
> >Importancia: Alta
> >
> >As you will all remember, in LA, we issued advice to the Board
> >regarding the highly regulated and sensitive TLD for which the GAC had
> >requested specific safeguards.
> >
> >To date, that advice has neither been accepted or rejected and is still
> >the subject of discussion.
> >
> >I have summarized the overall story and have provided the assessment
> >that I, Evan and Olivier have made of the TLD in question.
> >
> >The board interaction with the ALAC on this issue has been
> >revolutionary (and will also be raised in the ALAC Board meeting in BA).
> >
> >In Buenos Aires, this issue will be on the agenda and there will be a
> >discussion with the GAC which will include this topic.
> >
> >Please review this document and the assessments that have been made,
> >and be prepared to indicate whether you agree with the assessments, or
> >to further discuss them.
> >
> >Alan
> >
> >
> >---
> >El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo electrónico en
> >busca de virus.
> >https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
>
>---
>El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este 
>correo electrónico en busca de virus.
>https://www.avast.com/antivirus




More information about the ALAC mailing list