[ALAC] Fwd: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Public Comment Review Tool

Alan Greenberg alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Thu Jun 11 21:32:34 UTC 2015


FYI.

>To: Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad at icann.org>, 
>"cwg-stewardship at icann.org" <cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
>From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
>Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Public Comment Review Tool
>
>I have reviewed the replies to the ALAC submission and offer three comments.
>
>The first is a general one. Although I am not sure how we could have 
>done otherwise given the volume of comments and the time-frame in 
>which the CWG had to review them, I find many of the answers lack 
>specificity and if I an my colleagues had not been on the calls to 
>argue the issues when they were discussed, I am not sure we would 
>have been very happy with how the answers were formulated. My next 
>point is one such example.
>
>In 200, the ALAC requested that at least for IFR members where where 
>is only one person per represented group, that Alternates be 
>formally allowed. The reply was that it would be considered by the 
>CWG in its further deliberations. To the best of my knowledge, this 
>was not considered (ie neither accepted nor rejected) and the 
>Proposal was unaltered.
>
>In 228, The ALAC raised the issue of the SIFR being triggered by a 
>vote of the ccNSO and GNSO. This was ultimately not changed 
>(although words were added regarding consultation). However the 
>reply says that the GNOS was replaced by the RySG, something that 
>simply did not happen. This needs to be corrected. But I am troubled 
>that there may be other similar examples where the CWG reply does 
>not mesh with what is in the final proposal.
>
>Alan
>
>At 11/06/2015 11:11 AM, Grace Abuhamad wrote:
>
>>Dear all,
>>
>>Attached is the updated Public Comment Review Tool. I have included 
>>a redline and a clean version. The document is now 300-pages, so 
>>quite lengthy to review. In the interest of time, to make sure 
>>those who submitted comments can see how the CWG addressed their 
>>submissions, we will post this Review Tool to the Wiki and Public 
>>Comment page. Should there be a need for further updates, we can 
>>update the documents as requested.
>>
>>The Wiki page is here: 
>><https://community.icann.org/x/x5o0Aw>https://community.icann.org/x/x5o0Aw.
>>
>>Best,
>>Grace
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20150611/e987a743/attachment.html>


More information about the ALAC mailing list