[ALAC] Fwd: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Public Comment Review Tool
Alan Greenberg
alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Thu Jun 11 21:32:34 UTC 2015
FYI.
>To: Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad at icann.org>,
>"cwg-stewardship at icann.org" <cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
>From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
>Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Public Comment Review Tool
>
>I have reviewed the replies to the ALAC submission and offer three comments.
>
>The first is a general one. Although I am not sure how we could have
>done otherwise given the volume of comments and the time-frame in
>which the CWG had to review them, I find many of the answers lack
>specificity and if I an my colleagues had not been on the calls to
>argue the issues when they were discussed, I am not sure we would
>have been very happy with how the answers were formulated. My next
>point is one such example.
>
>In 200, the ALAC requested that at least for IFR members where where
>is only one person per represented group, that Alternates be
>formally allowed. The reply was that it would be considered by the
>CWG in its further deliberations. To the best of my knowledge, this
>was not considered (ie neither accepted nor rejected) and the
>Proposal was unaltered.
>
>In 228, The ALAC raised the issue of the SIFR being triggered by a
>vote of the ccNSO and GNSO. This was ultimately not changed
>(although words were added regarding consultation). However the
>reply says that the GNOS was replaced by the RySG, something that
>simply did not happen. This needs to be corrected. But I am troubled
>that there may be other similar examples where the CWG reply does
>not mesh with what is in the final proposal.
>
>Alan
>
>At 11/06/2015 11:11 AM, Grace Abuhamad wrote:
>
>>Dear all,
>>
>>Attached is the updated Public Comment Review Tool. I have included
>>a redline and a clean version. The document is now 300-pages, so
>>quite lengthy to review. In the interest of time, to make sure
>>those who submitted comments can see how the CWG addressed their
>>submissions, we will post this Review Tool to the Wiki and Public
>>Comment page. Should there be a need for further updates, we can
>>update the documents as requested.
>>
>>The Wiki page is here:
>><https://community.icann.org/x/x5o0Aw>https://community.icann.org/x/x5o0Aw.
>>
>>Best,
>>Grace
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20150611/e987a743/attachment.html>
More information about the ALAC
mailing list