[ALAC] Community Priority Evaluations [Any Updates?]

Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond ocl at gih.com
Sat Jan 18 10:52:50 UTC 2014


Dear Sala,

thanks for your follow-up. The general concern was that the ALAC asked
for community involvement on those community evaluation panels. The
Board rejected that idea in its response. The ship sailed without us. We
tried to alert the Captain of the ship as it sailed. It will sailed
without us.

Kind regards,

Olivier

On 18/01/2014 11:46, Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro wrote:
> Dear Olivier,
>
> Many thanks. I will wait to hear Heidi's report and read the summary when it becomes available. Would it help of RALOs alongside the ALAC also publish statements to drive the message home?
>
> I am glad that it's on the ALAC Leadership Team's agenda.
>
> Best Wishes,
> Sala
>
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>> On Jan 18, 2014, at 11:31 PM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Sala,
>>
>> the ALAC Leadership Team (ALT) discussed this. One of my Action Items
>> was to contact the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) and ask them about
>> the Community component of their panels. I reported that to-date, I
>> still have not received any reply or acknowledgement from the EIU.
>> With the lack of information, Heidi has been tasked to find out with
>> staff what is the progress of the CPE and will revert back to us, in
>> time for the monthly ALAC call which this month will take place on 28
>> January 2014.
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Olivier
>>
>>> On 17/01/2014 21:51, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro wrote:
>>> Dear ALAC,
>>>
>>> Rinalia had updated us on November 20, 2013, re: CPE:
>>>
>>> *"The ALAC sent advice to the ICANN board requesting for preferential
>>> treatment of community applications that fulfill certain criteria precisely
>>> because we knew that an auction as a process for resolving string
>>> contention would disadvantage community applicants with less financial
>>> means than big industry players.  We also urged the Board to ensure that
>>> the Economist Intelligence Unit has sufficient community expertise in its
>>> panel that is tasked to conduct the Community Priority Evaluation (CPE)
>>> because community strings that pass the CPE would be in the position to
>>> knock out competing applications without going to action.  Sadly, the Board
>>> response on these matters has been most disappointing."*
>>>
>>> Wonder what the developments and hope that the ALAC will continue pushing
>>> the global public interest in this regard.
>>>
>>> Sala
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ALAC mailing list
>>> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>>>
>>> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>>> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>> _______________________________________________
>> ALAC mailing list
>> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>>
>> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)




More information about the ALAC mailing list