[ALAC] Statement regarding the CCWG submission to NETmundial

[Evan Leibovitch]

Actually, now that the conference is over I believe that a new ALAC
response is in order; one that congratulates the organizers and the
participants for their innovation in approaching governance. We should
(IMO) also endorse the final statement (while indicating areas where we
would have preferred stronger language).

I am happy to help craft such a statement, when I return from dealing with
personal matters at the end of this week.
On Apr 29, 2014 11:54 PM, "Alan Greenberg" <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:

> I have re-read the statement submitted to NETmundial. I believe that the
> ALAC can easily say that it supports the process by which this statement
> was developed as well as the full contents.
>
> However, as events unfolded, with the exception of the concept of
> multistakeholderism, the issues on which the CCWG statement raised were not
> the issues that NETmundial focused on, nor were they central to the
> NETmundial outcomes document. In consideration of that and the lack of any
> other public comments submitted, I believe that there is no need for the
> ALAC to submit a statement.
>
> Should the ALAC nonetheless feel that a submission is necessary, I suggest:
>
>  The ALAC would like to go on record as supporting the process that the
>> CCWG followed in drafting this statement, and supports the CCWG statement
>> submitted to NETmundial.
>>
>
> See https://community.icann.org/x/lzbRAg
>
> Alan
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+
> Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>