[ALAC] Minority statement for the IGO-INGO identifier protection PDP Final Report

Carlton Samuels carlton.samuels at gmail.com
Sat Nov 16 18:36:16 UTC 2013


I could support this.
-Carlton


==============================
Carlton A Samuels
Mobile: 876-818-1799
*Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
=============================


On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>wrote:

> And a newer version correcting two grammar problems (thanks to Evan for
> catching them).  Alan
>
>
> At 14/11/2013 01:29 PM, Alan Greenberg wrote:
>
>> I have replaced the sentence in question with:
>>
>>  The collection of Recommendations with Consensus level or Strong
>>> support, taken as a whole, do not form a cohesive and consistent set of
>>> policies. Although each individual Recommendation received sufficient
>>> support, the net result is a set of Recommendations may be incomplete and
>>> perhaps even conflicting.
>>>
>>
>> and a footnote:
>>
>>  As an example, there may be cases where a strong protection is not
>>> recommended, but the recommendations may be silent on weaker forms of
>>> protection.
>>>
>>
>>
>> aLAN
>>
>>
>>
>> At 13/11/2013 09:38 PM, Evan Leibovitch wrote:
>>
>>> Since these are modifications for clarity, I'll suggest one more. One
>>> bothered me and I now have a better idea how to express what it was.
>>>
>>> "If the Recommendations with Consensus level or Strong support were
>>> implemented, there is no assurance that they form a cohesive and consistent
>>> set of policies."
>>>
>>> I recall this statement being questioned by members of the working
>>> group, for it is difficult to parse. What I believe it intended is that the
>>> selection of resolutions that achieved Consensus are not together
>>> reflective of a single approach to the issue, and in some cases the
>>> statements that apparently have Consensus even seem to contradict each
>>> other.
>>>
>>> In light of this, I suggest this re-working of the line that is clearer
>>> and more direct to the point.
>>>
>>> "The collection of Recommendations with Consensus level or Strong
>>> support, taken as a whole, do not form a cohesive and consistent set of
>>> policies"
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> - Evan
>>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki:
> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>



More information about the ALAC mailing list