[ALAC] BGC decision of NCSG reconsideration request on TM+50

[Hong Xue]

Irrespective of whether 50+ is policy or implementation, I don't believe
the BGC recommendation's interpretation that the "rules of implementation"
are solely in the discretion of staff, not subject to the MS participation
and supervision, be accurate.

Hong


On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 2:56 AM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>wrote:

> At 21/05/2013 01:35 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
>
> >On 21 May 2013, at 06:40, Alan Greenberg wrote:
> >
> > > One of the arguments that registries have made is that
> > > this option was already discussed several years ago and was discarded
> > > at that time, SO IT SHOULD NOT BE RAISED AGAIN. In effect, the
> > > elimination of that option several years ago enshrined NOT doing it
> > > in effective policy.
> >
> >at least not without another PDP to change the policy.
> >
> >avri
>
> So you are saying that something that was implementation several
> years ago when discussed during the various versions of the AG, is
> now policy, and moreover, it would require a PDP to change (not just
> a GNSO policy process but a formal PDP even though it is not a
> subject for Consensus Policy as per Bylaws Annex A - "If the GNSO is
> conducting activities that are not intended to result in a Consensus
> Policy, the Council may act through other processes.")
>
> Alan
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki:
> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>



-- 
Professor Dr. Hong Xue
Director of Institute for the Internet Policy & Law (IIPL)
Beijing Normal University
http://www.iipl.org.cn/
19 Xin Jie Kou Wai Street
Beijing 100875 China