[ALAC] BGC decision of NCSG reconsideration request on TM+50

[Alan Greenberg]

At 21/05/2013 01:35 AM, Avri Doria wrote:

>On 21 May 2013, at 06:40, Alan Greenberg wrote:
>
> > One of the arguments that registries have made is that
> > this option was already discussed several years ago and was discarded
> > at that time, SO IT SHOULD NOT BE RAISED AGAIN. In effect, the
> > elimination of that option several years ago enshrined NOT doing it
> > in effective policy.
>
>at least not without another PDP to change the policy.
>
>avri

So you are saying that something that was implementation several 
years ago when discussed during the various versions of the AG, is 
now policy, and moreover, it would require a PDP to change (not just 
a GNSO policy process but a formal PDP even though it is not a 
subject for Consensus Policy as per Bylaws Annex A - "If the GNSO is 
conducting activities that are not intended to result in a Consensus 
Policy, the Council may act through other processes.")

Alan