[ALAC] Thick Whois Comment - Final

[Alan Greenberg]

Holly, may be worth saying, but it does not really fit into the 
questions being asked or the mandate of this PDP.

Alan

At 14/01/2013 05:59 PM, Holly Raiche wrote:
>Hi Alan
>
>Sorry not to comment earlier.  Is it worth saying that the current 
>work being done by the IETF to develop WEIRDS will allow tiered 
>access to Whois data - recognising the legitimate need of 
>individuals and organisations for not having their details made 
>public,while addressing legitimate needs of the LEAs for access to 
>Whois information?
>
>Holly
>
>
>On 15/01/2013, at 9:45 AM, Alan Greenberg wrote:
>
> > I have revised the reply to the Thick Whois PDP WQ
> > (https://community.icann.org/x/kIVZAg) based on a suggestion from
> > Evan on competition, and one issue raised by Michele Neylon on local
> > law violation (not in the form of a suggestion, but an issue that
> > merits ALAC comment).
> >
> > The Wiki points to both a redline version showing the changes and a
> > final version.
> >
> > Given that there have been no negative comments to the original
> > statement, and additional changes submitted during the last few days,
> > I request that Olivier initiate a formal vote on this document.
> >
> > Alan
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ALAC mailing list
> > ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
> >
> > At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> > ALAC Working Wiki: 
> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)