[ALAC] Red Cross/IOC - Questions for Consensus Call - Reply due by September 26th

Avri Doria avri at acm.org
Tue Sep 25 05:01:08 UTC 2012


That sounds very accusatory. And after I just said I did nothing, you presume censorship.  Hmmm.

As for my draft, that its a first statement of where I thought we were going. If the alac wishes to say something different, please do so. It its not for me to advise the alac on what it should say.

"Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro" <salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com> wrote:

>Frankly guys I am alarmed. I disagree with the introductory statement
>made
>on the wiki and am concerned with the swift change of context as this
>is
>absolutely contrary to what was put to the ALAC.
>
>I am alarmed at the *censorship* taking place within the ALAC itself if
>it
>indeed is taking place. I am of course optimistic and hoping that this
>was
>a technical error.
>
>Kind Regards,
>Sala
>
>On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Don't know. I did not remove anything except the notes about
>placeholders.
>>
>>
>> I did have some editing problems at one point but don't see how that
>would
>> delete anything.
>>
>> "Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro"
><salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear All,
>>>
>>> I have *one simple* question. Why was my comment (submissions)
>removed
>>> from the Wiki? https://community.icann.org/x/wowoAg
>>>
>>> The context has now changed to addressing the Board and not the GNSO
>>> IOC/RC Draft Team.
>>>
>>> Kind Regards,
>>> Sala
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Alan Greenberg
><alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> One short comment here. I do not agree at all. The interim
>protection
>>>> is giving them SO much less than what they want that they could not
>>>> afford to not participate actively to try to get more.
>>>>
>>>> Alan
>>>>
>>>> At 24/09/2012 10:19 PM, Avri Doria wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >I contend that if we go into this with a base level that says two
>>>> >and only two organizations already have base level protections at
>>>> >the second level, there will be no incentive for them to cooperate
>>>> >in a PDP that might give them less.
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> ALAC mailing list
>>>> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>>>>
>>>> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>>>> ALAC Working Wiki:
>>>>
>https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala
>>> P.O. Box 17862
>>> Suva
>>> Fiji
>>>
>>> Twitter: @SalanietaT
>>> Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro
>>> Fiji Cell: +679 998 2851
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Avri Doria
>>
>
>
>
>-- 
>Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala
>P.O. Box 17862
>Suva
>Fiji
>
>Twitter: @SalanietaT
>Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro
>Fiji Cell: +679 998 2851

Avri Doria


More information about the ALAC mailing list