[ALAC] Red Cross/IOC - Questions for Consensus Call - Reply due by September 26th

[Avri Doria]

Hi,  

my point its that there are those who would give far less, so they might have to satisfice with what they are given. Also I indicated that if it looks like the PDP its tending toward less, or perhaps for one and not the other, then they have nothing to lose other than what they have been granted through the charity of the board.

The most important point its that the special protections given by the board to both become a base we will not be able to get below, it its the starting point and not one of the possible ending points. 


Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:

>One short comment here. I do not agree at all. The interim protection 
>is giving them SO much less than what they want that they could not 
>afford to not participate actively to try to get more.
>
>Alan
>
>At 24/09/2012 10:19 PM, Avri Doria wrote:
>
>>I contend that if we go into this with a base level that says two 
>>and only two organizations already have base level protections at 
>>the second level, there will be no incentive for them to cooperate 
>>in a PDP that might give them less.

Avri Doria