[ALAC] Analysis of WHOIS AoC RT Recommendations.

Rinalia Abdul Rahim rinalia.abdulrahim at gmail.com
Mon Sep 3 01:48:31 UTC 2012


Dear Alan,

Can you please clarify what you mean by 'requiring policy development,' but
not a formal PDP?

Thank you.

Best regards,

Rinalia

Rinalia Abdul Rahim

sent via galaxy tab
 On 3 Sep 2012 09:27, "Alan Greenberg" <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:

> You will recall that at its last meeting, the ALAC unanimously approved a
> statement to the Board reiterating its position that all 16 recommendations
> be implemented, and stressed that several were very important and clearly
> did not require any prior GNSO policy development. That ALAC statement can
> be found at http://tinyurl.com/ALAC-WHOIS-**Advice<http://tinyurl.com/ALAC-WHOIS-Advice>
> .
>
> Based on further discussions, and in light of a controversy that has
> arisen in the GNSO, it was suggested that the ALAC explicitly identify
> which recommendations do not require any prior policy development, and
> which might required GNSO policy development.
>
> I had already done a brief review looking at which recommendations might
> require policy development. I have since revised this and present it to you
> here.
>
> In summary, of the 16 recommendations, 12 do not require GNSO policy
> development, 3 *might* require policy development, but that would depend on
> work carried out over the coming months and years, and 1 does require
> policy development by the GNSO along with the rest of the community, but in
> my opinion, does not require a formal PDP.
>
> The detailed analysis is attached. The report with the recommendations in
> detail can be found at http://www.icann.org/en/about/**
> aoc-review/whois/final-report-**11may12-en.pdf<http://www.icann.org/en/about/aoc-review/whois/final-report-11may12-en.pdf>
> .
>
> It is essential that this analysis reach the Board before the Board
> Workshop scheduled for September 12-13.
>
> I am not sure if Olivier wants to hold a formal vote on this, or for the
> ALAC to just reach consensus, but regardless, the first step if for anyone
> who does not agree with this analysis to speak up.
>
> Alan
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki:
> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>



More information about the ALAC mailing list