[ALAC] Fwd: [council] FW: URS update

[Evan Leibovitch]

Good news indeed.

Now, wouldn't ICANN have saved us all a lot of grief by doing this in the
first place?



On 22 November 2012 10:05, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:

> FYI. Alan
>
> >From: Olof Nordling [mailto:olof.nordling at icann.org]
> >Sent: 22 November 2012 10:26
> >To: Jonathan Robinson (jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com)
> >Subject: URS update
> >
> >Dear Jonathan,
> >
> >The deadline for responses to the URS RFI has passed and I'm happy
> >to inform you that we have received several responses which we are
> >now evaluating. Moreover, my first impression is that the situation
> >looks quite promising, both in terms of adherence to the URS text
> >and regarding the target fee. This also means that there is less of
> >an urgency than I previously thought  to convene a drafting team
> >(and I'm glad to have been proven wrong in that regard!). There may
> >still be details where such a drafting team can provide useful
> >guidance and I will get back to you with further updates on this and
> >other URS matters as we advance with the evaluations.
> >
> >Very best regards
> >
> >Olof
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki:
> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>



-- 
Evan Leibovitch
Toronto Canada

Em: evan at telly dot org
Sk: evanleibovitch
Tw: el56