[ALAC] Interesting correspondence

[Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond]

Thanks for your follow-up Alan.
I am not a fan of digital archery either - and I suspect our community
dislikes it too since it is played automatically for a fee by Pool.Com,
the cherry on the cake being that the NomCom Chair Elect is running
Pool.com.
Something screams "that's wrong" somewhere.

I'll first follow-up with Steve Metalitz. In the meantime, I wonder if
it would be worth drafting a statement that goes further than "yes we
agree".

Kind regards,

Olivier

On 12/05/2012 03:31, Alan Greenberg wrote :
> Timing is one of the issues. I have been trying to find the date that 
> the "2nd timestamp" archery was due to start (presuming the original 
> end of applications) but couldn't does anyone know what the delay was 
> supposed to be between close of application period and start og the 
> archery competition?
>
> Alan
>
> At 11/05/2012 07:19 PM, Cheryl Langdon-Orr wrote:
>
>> Thanks for these links Alan...
>>
>> It strikes me Olivier that the document (briefly discussed if not 
>> made available during CR meeting)  from Steve / IPC  re an 
>> 'alternate  catagorisation method for adjunct use in a batching 
>> method  as oppossed to the digital archery 'crapola shoot'  yes I am 
>> not a fan either ;-) might be well worth endorsing formally and 
>> tossing back "into the mix" with these two documents for consideration...
>>
>> OCL. perhaps with input from Steve re the status of that discussion 
>> paper for Costa Rica we might be able to get a fresh discussion 'on 
>> the agenda. Or at least ALAC Advice 'on the books,....
>>
>> From my Android Tablet...
>>
>> Cheryl  Langdon-Orr (CLO)
>> tweeter @clo3
>> <http://about.me/cheryl.LangdonOrr>http://about.me/cheryl.LangdonOrr
>> On May 12, 2012 7:10 AM, "Alan Greenberg" 
>> <<mailto:alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:
>> Two letters protesting the Digital Archery method of new gTLD
>> Batching. As tempting as it is, I will not add any editorial
>> comments, but do suggest that you read them (hint, I am not a fan of
>> the proposed batching technique).
>> -
>> <http://www.icann.org/en/news/correspondence/metalitz-to-icann-board-09may12-en.pdf>http://www.icann.org/en/news/correspondence/metalitz-to-icann-board-09may12-en.pdf
>> - http://www.icann.org/en/news/correspondence/isc-to-icann-10may12-en.pdf
>>
>> Not yet published on the ICANN Correspondence page, a letter on
>> behalf of the International Olympic Committee making a formal Board
>> Reconsideration Request related to the Board decision not to adopt
>> the first-level changes approved by the GNSO. It is interesting that
>> such a request goes to the Chair of the Board Governance Committee,
>> who happens to be Bruce Tonkin, a conflicted Board member (related to
>> new gTLDs) who cannot take part in any discussions or decision
>> related to new gTLDs.
>> - 
>> <http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-iocrc-dt/msg00455.html>http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-iocrc-dt/msg00455.html
>>
>> Alan
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ALAC mailing list
>> <mailto:ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org>ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>>
>> At-Large Online: <http://www.atlarge.icann.org>http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>> ALAC Working Wiki: 
>> <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)>https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>

-- 
Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
http://www.gih.com/ocl.html