[ALAC] Modification of statement submitted regarding At-Large Director Bylaws

[Alan Greenberg]

The process is already very complicated due to the setup that has 
been adopted by At-Large. Once a person is not on the slate, there is 
no reason that they cannot be re-enfranchised. I am not sure how any 
voting can be neutral, as by its very definition it requires people 
(or organizations if RALO's direct votes) to make very personal decisions.

And whether such a person will be replaced in the interim is not at 
all clear. Although I have suggested such a mechanism in my initial 
comments, they were not part of the proposed Bylaw revision for all voters.

Alan

At 25/08/2010 10:03 PM, Hong Xue wrote:

>I'm uncomfortable with inclusion of the following all-capitalized 
>part, which will not only substantially complicated the process 
>(replacement and then resumption to position) but deviate from 
>neutral voting (an applicant published --not selected candidate-- 
>back to be a voter).
>
>
>
>SHOULD A PERSON SUBJECT TO THIS SECTION NOT BE
>LISTED ON THE PUBLISHED FINAL SLATE OF CANDIDATES, THE TERMS OF THIS
>SECTION NO LONGER APPLY.
>
>
>Hong