[NA-Discuss] Opinions Requested

[Seth M Reiss]

It might be helpful if you could cut and past the relevant rule so we can better understand the procedural issue.

 

Seth

 

From: na-discuss-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:na-discuss-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Glenn McKnight
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 7:38 AM
To: NA Discuss
Subject: [NA-Discuss] Opinions Requested

 

Hi Folks

 

Recently I notified the NARALO membership to expect a vote to  agree or  disagree on including Sebastien  Bachollet  as a candidate in the slate for the  Board seat.   Currently only two names are on the slate  This week EURALO completed a purpose vote from their ALS's that agreed that he should be included.   

 

The rules require that two additional RALO's must  agree PASSIONATELY  to expand the slate to include Sebastien 

 

In order to measure  our  passion on this subject it seems we need to ask the community first on your views on this subject. If we feel passionate to include him then I will direct Ariel to promptly send out the vote.  

 

Please note we have very little time to discuss this situation given the timelines set by the committee.  Changes in these processes should be high on the agenda for the next election cycle to reduce this type of confusion

 

Take a minute and express your opinion on this subject .  If the majority of the opinions supports a vote so be it.  If the majority is against a vote we will tell the committee that our RALO will not hold a vote,   A 'no vote' resulting in no support for  adding  Sebastien to the slate.

 

Opinions welcome

 




Glenn McKnight
mcknight.glenn at gmail.com
skype  gmcknight
twitter gmcknight
.



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/na-discuss/attachments/20170124/ff34dc10/attachment.html>