[NA-Discuss] address allocation, was Google Fiber

[Joly MacFie]

It's not out of the question, I guess, that NARALO could participate, as a
body, in the RIR pdp.




On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Eric Brunner-Williams <
ebw at abenaki.wabanaki.net> wrote:

> On 1/27/13 3:25 PM, John R. Levine wrote:
> >
> >
> > If IANA tried to tell the RIRs what to do with the returned blocks,
> > there wouldn't be any more returned blocks.
>
> Address policy is developed by the RIRs. This is one of the
> significant differences between ICANN "names" policy development,
> which is without any geographic locus (other than the obvious one in
> Marina del Rey), or "global" (with the equally obvious caveats on what
> "global" might, or might not mean) and ICANN "address" policy development.
>
> Of all the ICANN bylaws entities I've paid attention to over the life
> of the Corporation, the distributed policy development of At Large
> regions (in theory) and that of the RIRs, are most similar.
>
> Eric
> ------
> NA-Discuss mailing list
> NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
>
> Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
> ------
>



-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------
Joly MacFie  218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast
WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com
 http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com
 VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org
--------------------------------------------------------------
-