[NA-Discuss] 2nd revision of NARALO Operating Procedures

Garth Bruen gbruen at knujon.com
Mon Aug 12 01:24:41 UTC 2013


Exactly. I will request staff begin the run-off vote when and if our OP
changes are agreed upon.

-----Original Message-----
From: na-discuss-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
[mailto:na-discuss-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Alan
Greenberg
Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2013 8:27 PM
To: Louis.Houle at isocquebec.org
Cc: NARALO Discussion List
Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] 2nd revision of NARALO Operating Procedures

I assume you are talking about the 2nd vote for Secretariat. I believe that
the consensus was that once we have adopted the new Operating Procedures,
Garth will call another vote for Secretariat.

Assuming no major issues are raised tomorrow, an online vote of ALSs will be
started soon after (the new rules could be approved on the call, but there
is normally not sufficient numbers present to meet the 70% required for a
rules change.

Alan

At 11/08/2013 06:51 PM, Houle Louis wrote:
>Thanks Alan,
>
>Some other concern that may remain is:
>
>Is the second vote public ? Should it be discussed and decided 
>tomorrow? Are the procedures clear (helpful) on that point?
>
>Louis Houle
>Président
>La Société Internet du Québec (ISOC Québec) Louis.Houle at isocquebec.org
>
>Le 2013-08-10 22:49, Alan Greenberg a écrit :
>>That possible confusion is hopefully eliminated in the last revision.
>>
>>13. now clearly says that the Chair may cast a second vote for ALAC 
>>member selections.
>>
>>19. Applies only to selection of the RALO Chair and Secretariat.
>>
>>Alan
>>
>>At 10/08/2013 07:57 PM, Houle Louis wrote:
>>>Indeed!
>>>
>>>Louis Houle
>>>Président
>>>La Société Internet du Québec (ISOC Québec) 
>>>Louis.Houle at isocquebec.org
>>>
>>>Le 2013-08-09 13:54, Evan Leibovitch a écrit :
>>>>No, you're right. There is a confusion between #13 and #19.
>>>>
>>>>- Evan (via mobile)
>>>>On 2013-08-09 11:01 AM, "Thompson, Darlene" <DThompson1 at gov.nu.ca>
wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Oh - ignore that last one - I hadn't read paragraph 19 yet.  My bad!
>>>>>
>>>>>D
>>>>>
>>>>>Darlene A. Thompson
>>>>>CAP Administrator
>>>>>N-CAP/Department of Education
>>>>>P.O. Box 1000, Station 910
>>>>>Iqaluit, NU  X0A 0H0
>>>>>Phone:  (867) 975-5631
>>>>>Fax:  (867) 975-5610
>>>>>dthompson at gov.nu.ca
>>>>>________________________________________
>>>>>From: na-discuss-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [ 
>>>>>na-discuss-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of Thompson, 
>>>>>Darlene [DThompson1 at gov.nu.ca]
>>>>>Sent: Friday, August 09, 2013 10:55 AM
>>>>>To: Alan Greenberg; NA-Discuss
>>>>>Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] 2nd revision of NARALO Operating 
>>>>>Procedures
>>>>>
>>>>>Refresh my memory.  I had thought that we had come to a consensus 
>>>>>that our three ALAC members would be the tie breakers for 
>>>>>Secretariat/Chair.  Also, under the proposed wording, what if the tie
is the Chair position?
>>>>>The
>>>>>existing Chair can't really cast the additional vote then.
>>>>>
>>>>>D
>>>>>
>>>>>Darlene A. Thompson
>>>>>CAP Administrator
>>>>>N-CAP/Department of Education
>>>>>P.O. Box 1000, Station 910
>>>>>Iqaluit, NU  X0A 0H0
>>>>>Phone:  (867) 975-5631
>>>>>Fax:  (867) 975-5610
>>>>>dthompson at gov.nu.ca
>>>>>________________________________________
>>>>>From: na-discuss-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [ 
>>>>>na-discuss-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of Alan 
>>>>>Greenberg [ alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca]
>>>>>Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 12:48 PM
>>>>>To: NA-Discuss
>>>>>Subject: [NA-Discuss] 2nd revision of NARALO Operating Procedures
>>>>>
>>>>>Based on comments, I have made a few more changes. These are shown 
>>>>>in BLUE.
>>>>>
>>>>>12/13. Normal procedure in the ALAC is now to hold secret votes for 
>>>>>elections/selections that are contended. The changes to 12 and 13 
>>>>>allow the NARALO to do this as well. This is in fact how we have 
>>>>>been operating, so the change just ratifies our existing behavior.
>>>>>
>>>>>16. Correct and error that said a suspended ALS could regain their 
>>>>>active status by voting, but voting is the thing they are not 
>>>>>allowed to do if inactive. Also added a provision whereby NARALO 
>>>>>can request the the ALAC de-certify an essentially defunct ALS. The 
>>>>>ALAC would still need to conduct due diligence, so the procedures 
>>>>>in NARALO do not need to be exceedingly detailed.
>>>>>
>>>>>Last call for additional issues?
>>>>>
>>>>>Alan
>>>>>------
>>>>>NA-Discuss mailing list
>>>>>NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>>>>https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
>>>>>
>>>>>Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
>>>>>------
>>>>>------
>>>>>NA-Discuss mailing list
>>>>>NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>>>>https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
>>>>>
>>>>>Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
>>>>>------
>>>>------
>>>>NA-Discuss mailing list
>>>>NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>>>https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
>>>>
>>>>Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
>>>>------
>>>
>>>------
>>>NA-Discuss mailing list
>>>NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>>https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
>>>
>>>Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
>>>------
>>

------
NA-Discuss mailing list
NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss

Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
------



More information about the NA-Discuss mailing list