[NA-Discuss] 2nd revision of NARALO Operating Procedures

[Alan Greenberg]

Yes.

At 08/08/2013 12:52 PM, gbruen at knujon.com wrote:
>Do you mean "contested"?
>
>Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
>Sender: na-discuss-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 12:48:15
>To: NA-Discuss<na-discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>Subject: [NA-Discuss] 2nd revision of NARALO Operating Procedures
>
>Based on comments, I have made a few more changes. These are shown in BLUE.
>
>12/13. Normal procedure in the ALAC is now to hold secret votes for
>elections/selections that are contended. The changes to 12 and 13
>allow the NARALO to do this as well. This is in fact how we have been
>operating, so the change just ratifies our existing behavior.
>
>16. Correct and error that said a suspended ALS could regain their
>active status by voting, but voting is the thing they are not allowed
>to do if inactive. Also added a provision whereby NARALO can request
>the the ALAC de-certify an essentially defunct ALS. The ALAC would
>still need to conduct due diligence, so the procedures in NARALO do
>not need to be exceedingly detailed.
>
>Last call for additional issues?
>
>Alan