[NA-Discuss] Length of At-Large Comment Periods
Danny Younger
dannyyounger at yahoo.com
Tue May 31 18:50:46 UTC 2011
As of late, I have noticed that when a Call for Comments is issued to the at-large community, the time-frame for providing comments in response to the Call is far from sufficient. Below I have listed the last eight Call for Comment cycles (announcement dates and comment closure dates are shown); the available time for comments can at best be described as a few days. A few days is simply not enough time for most individuals, and I can't imagine that organizational entities would take any comfort in the present arrangement. It would be appreciated if something could be done to improve the present situation.
1. Call for Comments: ALAC Statement on the Public Call by the Stability, Security and Resilience of the DNS Review Team
Announced 01 April
Deadline 03 April
2. Call for Comments: ALAC Statement on the Proposed Framework for the FY12 Operating Plan and Budget
Announced 04 April
Deadline 04 April
3. Call for Comments: ALAC Statement on the Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery Working Group Proposed Final Report
Announced 20 April
Deadline 22 April
4. Call for Comments: ALAC Statement to the ICANN Board on the RAA Negotiations
Announced 22 April
Deadline 29 April
5. Call for Comments: JAS WG Second Milestone Report
Announced 08 May
Deadline 09 May
6. Call for Comments: ALAC Statement on the Proposal for Renewal of the .NET Registry Agreement
Announced 11 May
Deadline 15 May
7. Call for Comments: ALAC Statement on Academia Representation on NomCom
Announced 20 May
Deadline 25 May
8. Call for Comments: ALAC Statement on eG8 Forum
Announced 20 May
Deadline 22 May
More information about the NA-Discuss
mailing list