[NA-Discuss] Requirements for NARALO individual membership and related motion (Beau, 10 min)

[Beau Brendler]

Actually, I believe that's a leftover agenda item from the last meeting. I probably won't get around to updating the agenda until Monday AM now, as the meeting apparently was accidentally deleted from ICANN staff's calendars and as a result I had not paid attention to the agenda until today. Unless there is something you want brought up, I probably won't put it on there.

When it was discussed, the general drift was to leave the individual membership requirements more or less alone, though I don't believe the issue was resolved as to creating more specificity for eligibility (i.e., indy members should be in a non-profit or non-commercial capacity). I'm the one who put the agenda item on there, out of concern for the pre-GAC scorecard kibitzing we were getting on the NA list from contracted parties. But that seems to have passed us, in both time and passion. And I understand that people generally want to err on the side of inclusiveness rather than exclusiveness.

Anyway, my opinion on that whole thing has evolved to basically this: I trust the individual membership representative, Eric B-W, to alert us to any concerns going forward.


-----Original Message-----
>From: Danny Younger <dannyyounger at yahoo.com>
>Sent: May 6, 2011 7:28 PM
>To: "na-discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org" <na-discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>Cc: Beau Brendler <beaubrendler at earthlink.net>
>Subject: Requirements for NARALO individual membership and related motion (Beau, 10 min)
>
>I see that the upcoming NARALO agenda has this item on it.  Which individual membership requirements are being re-evaluated and what is the motion that will be up for discussion?
>
>Thanks,
>Danny