[NA-Discuss] Fwd: Edits and comments to NARALO/ALAC position statement on GAC scorecard

Thompson, Darlene DThompson1 at GOV.NU.CA
Wed Mar 30 19:44:23 UTC 2011

And Beau is an individual member of NARALO.  Just to clarify.


Darlene A. Thompson
CAP Administrator
N-CAP/Department of Education
P.O. Box 1000, Station 910
Iqaluit, NU  X0A 0H0
Phone:  (867) 975-5631
Fax:  (867) 975-5610
dthompson at gov.nu.ca
From: na-discuss-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [na-discuss-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of Beau Brendler [beaubrendler at earthlink.net]
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 12:34 PM
To: Avri Doria; NARALO Discussion List
Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] Fwd: Edits and comments to NARALO/ALAC        position        statement on GAC scorecard

In answer to the second part of Avri's question: With all due respect for Antony and Richard, both are CEO/executive-level at for-profit registries and engaged in business development for their companies. Registries are amply represented by other constituencies in ICANN. They hardly need NARALO to get their points across as "individual Internet users."

I would go so far to suggest that NARALO and ALAC spend their valuable volunteer time engaging and working with the user community to make sure its point of view, which is not tied to corporate profits, is heard, and let registry and registrar executives use the significant, well-established ICANN venues for their agendas.

-----Original Message-----
>From: Avri Doria <avri at ella.com>
>Sent: Mar 26, 2011 5:11 PM
>To: NARALO Discussion List <na-discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] Fwd: Edits and comments to NARALO/ALAC position      statement on GAC scorecard
>does this meant the RALO's will do a quick vote on the ALAC scorecard position?  Or will an ALAC vote be enough. Or is the sort of this that the ExecutiveCommittee can take care of?
>Also, couldn't either of the two gentleman join their respective RALO as individuals even if they had the opportunity to be observers in a GNSO constituency?
>with kind regards,
>On 26 Mar 2011, at 14:13, Evan Leibovitch wrote:
>> In the meantime, let's first see if there's even interest in principle about
>> any of the "impossible" things we're asking for before sinking substantial
>> volunteer time into the details.
>NA-Discuss mailing list
>NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org

NA-Discuss mailing list
NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org

Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org

More information about the NA-Discuss mailing list