[NA-Discuss] Fwd: Edits and comments to NARALO/ALAC position statement on GAC scorecard
richardtindal at me.com
Sat Mar 26 19:02:55 UTC 2011
I think you already explored whether there's interest in principle when you made this recommendation last time. The response then was - How would you implement this?
I don't think its fair to criticize the staff for failing to come up with implementation solutions if we don't have any to offer ourselves. Has ALAC given thought to how this would be implemented? If not, I think now's the time to do so.
On Mar 26, 2011, at 11:13 AM, Evan Leibovitch wrote:
> Hi Richard,
> On 26 March 2011 13:49, Richard Tindal <richardtindal at me.com> wrote:
> If the ALAC report does not provide guidance to staff/Board on how to chose the winners, the report will simply re-ask them to do something they have already said is unimplementable.
> There are quite a few instances in the ALAC statement that require staff to do something they insist can't be done. Categories, differential pricing and eliminating the DRSP, amongst others.
> Perhaps the answer is different staff that is not quite so limited.
> In the meantime, let's first see if there's even interest in principle about any of the "impossible" things we're asking for before sinking substantial volunteer time into the details.
> - Evan
More information about the NA-Discuss