[LAC-Discuss] Improvement of the win-win relationship between the Staff and the At-Large Community

Daniel Monastersky danielmonastersky at gmail.com
Tue Jun 10 15:43:51 EDT 2008


1.   What issues being debated in ICANN do you believe are the most

important to your RALO?

- Internet users security

- Child Pornography



2.   How can we help make the time you spend on ICANN issues as valuable and

efficient to you as possible?

Sending a periodically brieft about the issues that each At large know and
has more interest.



3.   What challenges and opportunities do you see for your RALO and for

At-Large more generally (in the context of ICANN work)?

- More information in our language to be reflected more easily to the RALO
users.

- I think that 1 user id in the ICANN web site for each at large member
could help to manage the information that is available for us. We could have
something like a control panel for each one.



4.   How interaction between and within RALOs be increased?

Like I said in point 3.



5.   What are the top three things you would like your RALO to achieve?

- Try to let know to our users how ICANN works.

- More participation at ICANN´s decition and meetings.



6.   What are the top three things you believe ICANN Staff could do to help

your RALO?

-          A better and simple comunication

-          Educating videos or interactive about ICANN and his news.

-          Better feedback to let now us about the meetings that we have to
participate.

Dr. Daniel Monastersky
Instituto Iberoamericano de Investigacion para la Sociedad de la Informacion
www.techlaw.com.ar
www.identidadrobada.com
Buenos Aires, Argentina

2008/6/10 At-Large Staff <staff en atlarge.icann.org>:

> In case you did not get this Email today, please find below the Email sent
> by the At-Large Staff
>
>
> Dear All:
>
> You will have received At-Large Staff¹s (Frederic Teboul¹s) recent email
> asking some questions of you as a member of the At-Large community and some
> of you have already replied. As there have been a few questions about the
> message, we would like to provide some additional information.
>
> Firstly, we want to emphasize that this effort is meant to be a
> collaborative process ­ we are asking you to provide information so that we
> can combine your answers with others in the At-Large community and create a
> summary of the community¹s views on how its involvement in ICANN can be
> better supported.  We will share the aggregated input with you, along with
> an analysis of the trends that we see, and our thoughts on how we might
> collectively ­ Staff and community - respond to the Regional At-Large
> Organizations¹ needs to support greater involvement in ICANN.  After
> community discussion and concurrence, an Action Plan will be publicly
> posted
> and implemented.
>
> To be clear, the questions you have been asked to respond to relate only to
> the At-Large community and its involvement in ICANN.  To avoid any
> confusion, we are re-stating the questions below, and would appreciate
> receiving your thoughts.
>
> This exercise is part of Staff's ongoing effort to better serve the
> At-Large
> community.  It is not related to the completely separate and independent
> ³ALAC Review² currently being conducted under the auspices of the Board as
> part of their process for reviewing all ICANN structures.
>
> We know you are all busy and that you volunteer for your At-Large group and
> ICANN in your spare time. On reflection, we therefore think the original
> deadline was overly ambitious. It would be a great help if we could get a
> good set of responses on or before the end of the Paris ICANN meeting (25th
> June). This will allow us to move on to the next steps in the process
> mentioned above in due course. That said, of course the kind of input we
> seek in this short questionnaire is always welcome ­ we are always glad to
> hear your thoughts, concerns and ideas.
>
> For your convenience, below you will find a restated set of the same
> questions.
>
> 1.   What issues being debated in ICANN do you believe are the most
> important to your RALO?
>
> 2.   How can we help make the time you spend on ICANN issues as valuable
> and
> efficient to you as possible?
>
> 3.   What challenges and opportunities do you see for your RALO and for
> At-Large more generally (in the context of ICANN work)?
>
> 4.   How interaction between and within RALOs be increased?
>
> 5.   What are the top three things you would like your RALO to achieve?
>
> 6.   What are the top three things you believe ICANN Staff could do to help
> your RALO?
>
> Many thanks in advance for your time with these questions ­ but also with
> ICANN!
>
> Regards,
>
> Nick Ashton-Hart, Matthias Langenegger, Frederic Teboul
> ICANN At-Large Staff
> email: staff en atlarge.icann.org
> _______________________________________________
> LAC-Discuss mailing list
> LAC-Discuss en atlarge-lists.icann.org
>
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org
>
> Homepage for the region: http://www.lacralo.org
>
> Posting guidelines to ensure machine translations of emails sent to the
> list are more accurate:
> http://www.funredes.org/mistica/english/emec/method_emec/presentation.html#anexo1
>


More information about the LAC-Discuss mailing list