[lac-discuss-es] [lac-discuss-en] LAC Strategy for Outreach and Engagement

[claireccraig at gmail.com]

[[-- Translated text (en -> es) --]]

Hola Dr. Pisanty
 Gracias por tus comentarios.

 Espero comentarios como usted ha sugerido. Cualquier comentario recibido será
 incorporado y circulado, antes de que el documento sea enviado hacia adelante.

 Saludos

 El lun 5 jun 2023 a las 11:07 Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch<apisan at unam.mx>
 escribió: 

> Claire,
>
>
> no, no, no, this should be pretty clear. You sent out a draft for
> comments, got comments. Now it is incumbent on the drafting team to absorb
> all comments and send a new draft, with at least 24 hours advance to the
> deadline of June 7. This is a basic process issue which should merit no
> further discussion. If you as Secretary are not involved the only step left
> is to pass it on to those who were, and follow up requiring a new version
> on time and circulating it.
>
>
> It is not only my observations that need to be absorbed. The statement
> that the plan may be overly ambitious should also generate a cycle of
> review, so that the drafters can wirte what the goals are, what happens if
> not all are met, so also if not all resources (people, money, availability
> of timeslots for meetings, admission into meetings, etc.) come together,
> the community knows what the fallback plan is. This is basic planning and
> again I don't see why it would merit further discussion.
>
>
> Alejandro Pisanty
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *De:* Claire C. Craig <claireccraig at gmail.com>
> *Enviado:* lunes, 5 de junio de 2023 05:46 a. m.
> *Para:* Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch
> *CC:* LAC-Discuss-en; Rodrigo de la Parra; Rodrigo Saucedo Linares
> *Asunto:* Re: [lac-discuss-en] LAC Strategy for Outreach and Engagement
>
> Dear Dr. Pisanty
> Thanks for those observations. Your feedback is duly noted and well
> articulated.
>
> As such, please fill in the gaps in the document as you identified or send
> me your contribution to the important LACRALO Strategy with the appropriate
> language based on your feedback as soon as possible, so that the document
> can be updated and recirculated.
>
> Thanks for taking the time to review, and I look forward to receiving your
> valuable and timely input.
>
> CCC
>
> On 4 Jun 2023, at 11:17 PM, Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch <apisan at unam.mx>
> wrote:
>
> 
>
> Hi,
>
>
> some observations:
>
>
>
>    1. The plan as presented is not framed within either LACRALO's
>    Strategic Plan for the same period nor (at least not explicitly) to any
>    other ICANN plans, whether At Large or ICANN-org. This should be remedied
>    ASAP for a second round of comments.
>    2. There are no quantitative, measurable goals (remember the acronym
>    SMART); this should be remedied by the drafting party.
>    3. The plan does not clearly link actions to the "Policy First" Agenda
>    agreed in the General Assembly of 2023 as well as in the process of
>    2014-2016. Every action by LACRALO has to be explained, measured, and
>    assessed according to its clear causal linkage to policy production in
>    formal PDPs. Which leads to the next:
>    4. There is no clear Theory of Change between the proposed actions and
>    their effects for the above mentioned.
>    5. One goal that must be included is a quantitative goal of bringing
>    in new organizations as ALSs. There is a perverse incentive for each
>    country's presently existing ALS to avoid recruiting new organizations as
>    ALS, as this would divide the weight of their votes by half. It will be
>    argued that this is particularly difficult to achieve in countries with
>    small populations, to the disadvantage of those with a rich, thriving
>    technical and social community around the Internet; still the goal must be
>    to add at least one ALS per country in the following 12 months.
>    6. There is no measure of transparency and accountability for the
>    participants, as to actually taking up the activity agreed, assessing its
>    quality, relevance, and impact with the intended audience, and feedback
>    from said audience. This reinforces the impression that LACRALO refuses any
>    measure of accountability. So be it as long as it is thought that LACRALO
>    is an isolated entity. However, this reflects badly on the perception of
>    the At-Large in general, and of ICANN in a broader sense, and even more
>    impactfully, on the multistakeholder processes in general. In the year that
>    the GDC and related UN SG and AG processes are being launced LACRALO would
>    be doing a great disservice to the Internet governance community by not
>    being scrupulously disciplined in this respect. So, the plan must include
>    such measures as well in the next draft to be circulated with time enough
>    for comments before the June 7 deadline.
>
>
> Alejandro Pisanty
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *De:* lac-discuss-en <lac-discuss-en-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org> en
> nombre de Claire Craig <claireccraig at gmail.com>
> *Enviado:* viernes, 2 de junio de 2023 11:31 a. m.
> *Para:* LAC-Discuss-en; Rodrigo de la Parra; Rodrigo Saucedo Linares
> *Asunto:* [lac-discuss-en] LAC Strategy for Outreach and Engagement
>
> Dear All
> Please see attached the LACRALO Outreach and Engagement Plan which was
> discussed at the last LACRALO Monthly Call.
>
> Please provide your comments by Wednesday 7 June, 2023 so that it can be
> approved for FY 24. If not comments are received, the plan would be
> considered as final and forwarded to the ICANN org staff,
>
> I look forward to your feedback as soon as possible.
>
> Claire C. Craig
> LACRALO Secretariat
>
>
>