[lac-discuss-es] = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ????
apisanty en gmail.com
apisanty en gmail.com
Jue Jun 25 15:36:04 UTC 2015
[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]
Asunto: Re: = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ????
Desde: apisanty en gmail.com
Hola,
creo Que Estamos en posicion de declarar ONU consensus Sobre Estós
lineamientos Ayer Sergio y Otros me manifestaron verbalmente Apoyo a la
Propuesta.
Alberto y Humberto, de verdad de verdad les pido instituir El Proceso
Correspondiente.
Estafa Podemos Consenso Este:
1. EXPLORAR La Situacion reales de las Organizaciones pecado Iniciar Procesos
Formales;
2. Cuales EXPLORAR Serian Las reglas Formales aplicables;
3. Ayudar Inmediato de una las Organizaciones que lo necesiten Más.
Saludos cordiales
Alejandro Pisanty
El Jue, 25 de junio 2015 a las 11:42 AM, <jam en jacquelinemorris.com> escribió:
>
> [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]
>
> Asunto: Re: = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ????
> Desde: jam en jacquelinemorris.com
>
> El diablo, es siempre, sin embargo, en los detalles.
> El 25 de junio 2015 10:28, "Carlton Samuels" <
> carlton.samuels en gmail.com> escribió:
>
>
> > Yes, we are now in the ballpark. I can support these for baseline.
> >
> > -Carlton
> >
> >
> > ==============================
> > Carlton A Samuels
> > Mobile: 876-818-1799
> > *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
> > =============================
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:57 AM, <apisanty en gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
> >>
> >> Subject: = utf-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz =????
> >> From: apisanty en gmail.com
> >>
> >> Colleagues,
> >>
> >>
> >> today at the monthly meeting face (f2) we held a brief discussion
> >> on metrics.
> >>
> >>
> >> Subject to this discussion back to his place in a working group,
> >> I think it is worth to make clear what the objective metrics. This
> >> It is well understood in the community, and those who say they do not
> >> They made by self-interest to distort the discussion.
> >>
> >>
> >> What we need we are accountability and transparency between us
> >> thereof. Individuals and organizations working activametne be
> >> identified. Organizations and individuals that do not contribute
> >> They involved to decide whether they will participate or no longer
> >> counted. And there
> >> an intermediate strip of organizations and representatives who are
> >> difficult to participate but have the will to do so.Among these there
> >> Many types of situations: a representative who is sick or has to
> >> spend time with family or work that sustains; changing
> >> directive or mandate; and many more circumstances.
> >>
> >>
> >> A good metric system would be simple, transparent, predictable, and
> >> difficult to counterfeit. Would make a "triage", ie would
> >> rather obvious
> >> 5-10 which are regularly participating organizations and
> >> They contribute 20 which are practically abandoned, and a strip
> >> intermediate 10 or 15 with which we must work in hopes that
> >> recover their participation or leave the organization voluntarily or
> >> by way of decertification. This assumes renewal cycles
> >> certifications, we must institute.
> >>
> >>
> >> There is a classification of units that can help us further
> >> in this process:
> >>
> >>
> >> 1. Regular and consistent participation in all activities, and
> >> contribution to substantive policy issues.His proposals are
> >> LACRALO incorporated into resolutions and have impact on policy
> >> ALAC and ICANN.
> >>
> >>
> >> 2. sporadic participation and / or devoted to procedural matters
> >> Reglaments, formats agreements but not their contents, etc.
> >>
> >>
> >> 3. sporadic appearances, little focus, and fundamentally
> >> leading to "make presence" for elections and selection
> >> processes
> >> for participation in events, especially if they involve support for
> >> travel.
> >>
> >>
> >> Our observation or measurement of participation of organizations
> >> should favor the type 1, type 3 disadvantage, and encourage those who
> >> make appearances type 2 pass to level 1.
> >>
> >>
> >> If we can have agreement around these principles, the Working Group
> >> Governance Metrics and only have to produce a good
> >> implementation and their work will be more reliable, predictable and
> >> achievable.
> >>
> >>
> >> Is there any disagreement with these general principles?
> >>
> >>
> >> Alejandro Pisanty
> >>
> >>
> >> -
> >> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> >> Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
> >> UNAM Faculty of Chemistry
> >> 3000 University Avenue,. 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
> >> + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD
> >> SMS FROM MEXICO +525541444475 +525541444475
> >> Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
> >> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
> >> UNAM Join the LinkedIn group,
> >> http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
> >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
> >> ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
> >> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>
[[--Original text (en)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/528d851f1c.html
--]]
Más información sobre la lista de distribución lac-discuss-es