¿Es éste Tiresome 'irregularidad' Contra Large At-Staff

Jue Jul 23 21:46:17 UTC 2015

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]

 Asunto: Re: ¿Es éste Tiresome 'irregularidad' Contra Large At-Staff 
 De: carlton.samuels en gmail.com

 Mi amigo Alejando, voy a irritar un poco más con la retórica. Y 
 no por favor, acepto que estoy utilizando el sentido clásico [Inglés] de la palabra. 

 Lo que se alega es puramente desafortunado mierda. 

 Lanza Hinds se articula a la ICANN a través de un memorando de entendimiento con la ICANN y caucus con 
 At-Large y LACRALO como representante de DevNet; él es el Presidente 
 y su representante para LACRALO. 

 Devnet es una organización no gubernamental que provee desarrollo de las TIC 
 servicios a los que están en el lado pobre de la brecha digital. DevNet 
 thusly representa los intereses de los usuarios finales. Piense en Devnet como la versión de Guyana 
 Internauta usarios etc etc. 

 El hombre es el presidente de la Cámara de Comercio de Georgetown en virtud de su 
 propiedad de una pequeña empresa; Tecnologías BrainStreet. Él deriva su 
 ingresos, su salario digno, principalmente de ese negocio.Él no consigue 
 pagado como Presidente de la Cámara de Comercio de Georgetown. 

 Aquí está el problema. No es inusual para los que estamos en el Caribe 
 tener muchas vidas; Su llamado responder al déficit de capacidad. decir eso 
 Lanza no puede ser un hombre de negocios y también representan los intereses del usuario final cuando 
 él es presidente de una ONG - el que a través de la que ha conectado a la ICANN 
 sistema - sólo se parece delirante para algunos de nosotros. 

 Al menos para aquellos de nosotros en el Caribe que son voluntarios para una cosa 
 u otro. 

 -Carlton 

 ============================== 
 Carlton Un Samuels 
 Móvil: 876-818-1799 
 * Estrategia, Planeación, Gobierno, Evaluación y plazos de entrega * 
 ============================= 

 El Jue, 23 de julio 2015 a las 4:20 de la tarde, el Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch &lt; 
 apisan en unam.mx&gt; escribió: 

>  Carlton,
>
>
>  The issue is very simple. A number of us find an irreconcilable conflict
> of interest in Lance Hinds's SoI. This is apparent only once the election
> was in course.
>
>  Simple. No rhetoric needed.
>
>  Alejandro Pisanty
>
>
>  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>      Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
> Facultad de QuÃmica UNAM
> Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
>
>
>
> +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD
>
> +525541444475 DESDE MÃ‰XICO SMS +525541444475
> Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
> Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn,
> http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
> ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
> .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
>   ------------------------------
> *Desde:* lac-discuss-en-bounces en atlarge-lists.icann.org [
> lac-discuss-en-bounces en atlarge-lists.icann.org] en nombre de Carlton
> Samuels [carlton.samuels en gmail.com]
> *Enviado el:* jueves, 23 de julio de 2015 16:03
> *Hasta:* lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> *CC:* Albert Daniels
> *Asunto:* [lac-discuss-en] This Tiresome 'Irregularity' Claim Against
> At-Large Staff
>
>    I am trying to live a long and useful life. Engagement with LACRALO is
> debilitating.
>
>  I am not communicant - I gave it up since I was 14 years old - so cannot
> depend on a 'good' God for my salvation. So for objective, I do what I must
> by avoiding vexations to my spirit.
>
>  But the bullshit - I hope the word translates well to Spanish - is just
> too much and I must break my silence.
>
>  In case the translation gets mangled, here is what I mean by bullshit:
>
>   Definitions of bullshit
>   noun
>  stupid or untrue talk or writing; nonsense.
>  verb
>  talk nonsense to (someone), typically to be misleading or deceptive.
>
>
>     â€‹It is misleading, even dishonest, to allege misconduct by At-Large
> staff in this instance and I will tell you why.
>
>  Jacqueline has already pithily outlined the classic case but I will
> repeat it here for effect.
>
>  In parts of the world where rules for [s]elections are established and
> where this exercise of democracy is routine, a candidate satisfying all
> other criteria and nominated for a position unopposed is duly [s]elected. â€‹
>
>  But this is LACRALO where our collective understanding of the process
> is, well, let me be generous and say uneven, at best.
>
>  We simply don't understand that you cannot disavow or subvert the
> nomination portion of the process without calling the entire [s]election
> process into question.
>
>  So, we walk extra miles to give those who don't understand time to come
> along, slowly.  That is the basis for the consensus poll - notice it is a
> poll - and why we in the Caribbean bothered to go along with that in the
> first place!
>
>  As At-Large staff would have told all of you, this is not the same for
> other RALOs. They have matured in both thought and action.
>
>  Why does this bother me, you ask? Because it gets old and tiresome after
> trying for so long. And since it vexes my spirit, I run the real risk of
> reducing my life and its quality the longer I caucus here.
>
>  Now, to the hypocrites.  I ask your forgiveness for not being a good
> Christian. I simply detest hypocrisy.
>
>  In the selection for a NomCom candidate this year, our esteemed
> colleague from Brazil and incumbent, Sylvia Leite Herlein, was nominated
> unopposed.  I enthusiastically supported her candidacy, not just only for
> the fact she had performed in the post. But I truly believe that a single
> 1-year term does not give the region the benefit of her service and
> expertise nor allow the region to build the influence we need in very
> important ICANN councils.
>
>  I personally discouraged - yes, discouraged - other nominations to muddy
> the path to her re-selection. We went along with Jacqueline Morris being
> de-selected after a single year. Maybe that was the wrong thing to do then.
>
>  With Sylvia's unopposed [s]election, no consensus poll took place.  And
> the At-Large staff notified the world in the same way as they did for Lance
> Hinds.
>
>  It was not that we in the Caribbean did not notice. Rather, it is
> because we have never felt any such poll was necessary in the first place.
>
>  Contrast then to now. There was not a whimper of complaint from our now
> erstwhile friends of LACRALO propriety, not one allegation of 'impropriety'
> raised!
>
>  So now, I ask you, what is the difference here? We can either assume the
> guardians of LACRALO propriety were off busily thumb-sucking, even asleep
> at the switch.
>
>  Or, in this case for Lance Hinds nomination and selection, other
> operating conditions are applied.
>
>  Go figure.
>
>  -Carlton Samuels
>
>  ==============================
>  Carlton A Samuels
> Mobile: 876-818-1799
> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
> =============================
>
>>
>>

[[--Original text (en)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/cdc6d761c5.html
--]]