[lac-discuss-es] Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce

Lun Ago 3 22:21:26 UTC 2015

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]

 Asunto: Re: Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce 
 De: alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca

 Gran parte de la atención de las reglas descritas aquí son en métricas y 
 cumplimiento. Eso probablemente no será un foco importante de la tarea 
 Fuerza. Independientemente, RALOs general puede establecer sus propias reglas y 
 expectativas más allá de los establecidos por el ALAC. El mayor 
 requisitos son que sean razonables teniendo en cuenta el potencial de la ELA 
 audiencia, que se documentan claramente, y que son 
 forzada de manera justa y uniforme. 

 Alan 

 Al 03.08.2015 09 a.m., Jacqueline Morris escribió: 
 > Como usted insiste, por supuesto, esto se transmitirá como 
 > Relevante. Por desgracia, que es un grupo de trabajo de TODOS RALOs y 
 > No sólo LACRALO, no puedo decir que el resto del grupo lo hará 
 > De acuerdo con el punto de vista de LACRALO. Esto es, después de todo, un grupo de trabajo para crear 
 > criterios que deben aplicarse a nivel mundial.
 > Y, por supuesto, estoy encantado de que otros miembros de LACRALO serán 
 > Participantes y tras el trabajo. 
 > Jacqueline 
 > El 02 de agosto 2015 23:15, &lt; <mailto:jumaropi at yahoo.com> jumaropi at yahoo.com&gt; escribió: 
 > 
 > [[- Texto Traducido (es -&gt; es) -]] 
 > 
>  Subject: Re: = UTF-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N = 
> - = = UTF-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ?????
>  From: <mailto:jumaropi at yahoo.com>jumaropi at yahoo.com
>
>  Alejandro thanks for that reminder. We will be watching.
>  We insist on it.
>  Cordially
>
>
>  Sent from my Huawei Mobile
>
>
>  Alejandro Pisanty <<mailto:apisanty at gmail.com>apisanty at gmail.com> wrote:
>  > Juan Manuel, answered with a copy to the list, because your 
> question is relevant to the community:
>  >
>  >
>  > June 24 I expressed what I reproduce below. In the course of 24 
> hours (25 June) we met the consensus of Carlton Samuels, Jacqueline 
> Morris, Sergio Salinas, and several others. Goes:
>  >
>  >
>  > "Today at the monthly meeting face (f2) we held a brief 
> discussion on metrics.
>  >
>  >
>  > Subject to this discussion back to his place in a working group, 
> I think it worthwhile to make clear what the objective metrics.This 
> is well understood in the community, and those who say they do not 
> self-interest to distort the discussion.
>  >
>  >
>  > What we need is accountability and transparency among ourselves. 
> Individuals and organizations working activametne must be 
> identified. Organizations and individuals that do not contribute or 
> participate must decide whether they will participate or no longer 
> counted. And there's a middle ground and representatives of 
> organizations who find it difficult to participate but have the 
> will to do so. Among these there are many types of situations: a 
> representative who is sick or has to spend time with family or work 
> that sustains; a policy change or mandate; and many more circumstances.
>  >
>  >
>  > A good metric system would be simple, transparent, predictable, 
> and difficult to counterfeit.Would make a "triage", ie, would quite 
> clear what organizations 5-10 regularly participate and contribute, 
> the 20 that are practically abandoned, and an intermediate strip of 
> 10 or 15 with which we must work in hopes that recover their 
> participation or leave the organization voluntarily or by way of 
> the decertification. This assumes cycles of renewal of 
> certificates, which must institute.
>  >
>  >
>  > There is a classification of units that can help us further in 
> this process:
>  >
>  >
>  > 1. Regular and consistent participation in all activities and 
> contribution to substantive policy issues. Their proposals are 
> incorporated in resolutions of LACRALO and impact on policies and ICANN ALAC.
>  >
>  >
>  > 2. sporadic participation and / or dedicated to issues 
> Reglaments procedure formats agreements but not their contents, etc.
>  >
>  >
>  > 3.sporadic, little focus, and fundamentally conducive to "make 
> presence" for elections and selection processes for equity 
> participation in events, especially if they involve support for travel.
>  >
>  >
>  > Our observation or measurement of participation of organizations 
> should encourage the Type 1, Type 3 disadvantage, and encourage 
> those who make equity type 2 pass to level 1.
>  >
>  >
>  > If we can have agreement around these principles, the Working 
> Group Governance Metrics and only have to produce a good 
> implementation and their work will be more reliable, predictable 
> and achievable. "
>  >
>  >
>  > Best regards,
>  >
>  >
>  > Alejandro Pisanty
>  >
>  >
>  > 08.02.2015 20:28 GMT-05: 00 Juan Manuel Rojas 
> <<mailto:jumaropi at yahoo.com>jumaropi at yahoo.com> :
>  >
>  > Thank you Alexander. We take those concerns before. TF. It 
> considered helpful to have clarity on the points that you mean specifically.
>  >
>  > Sent from my Huawei Mobile
>  >
>  > Alejandro Pisanty <<mailto:apisanty at gmail.com>apisanty at gmail.com> wrote:
>  >
>  > Jacqueline, Juan Manuel, all,
>  >
>  >
>  > The regional point of view has been expressed in the consensus 
> that we out of the meeting in Buenos Aires, with general criteria 
> for ALS reached consensus and are of great strength and general validity.
>  >
>  >
>  > I hope these guidelines define what they will do our representatives.
>  >
>  >
>  > Alejandro Pisanty
>  >
>  >
>  > On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 3:12 PM, 
> <<mailto:jam at jacquelinemorris.com>jam at jacquelinemorris.com> wrote:
>  >
>  >
>  > [[- Translated text (en -> en) -]]
>  >
>  > Subject: Re: = UTF-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N 
> = - = = UTF-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ?????
>  > From: <mailto:jam at jacquelinemorris.com>jam at jacquelinemorris.com
>  >
>  > Thank you. I will do my best to represent the region in the
>  > WG.
>  > Jacqueline
>  >
>  >
>  > Jacqueline A. Morris
>  > Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, necessary, invisible,
>  > Free.(After Chris Lehmann 
> <<http://twitter.com/chrislehmann>http://twitter.com/chrislehmann> )
>  >
>  >
>  > The Sun, August 2, 2015 at 12:29 PM 
> <<mailto:asoto at ibero-americano.org>asoto at ibero-americano.org> wrote:
>  >>
>  >> [[Translated text (es -> en) -]]
>  >>
>  >> ??? Subject: = utf-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N = - = =
>  >> Utf-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ?????
>  >> From: <mailto:asoto at ibero-americano.org>asoto at ibero-americano.org
>  >>
>  >> Dear, on This issue we Have had four nominations. ACCORDING to the above
>  >> Opportunely criteria, They Have Been selected:
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> Jacqueline Morris
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> - Juan Manuel Rojas
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> We Know That esta WG will have a hard work, and the first meeting will be
>  >> Tomorrow August 3rd. I will notify Juan Manuel Jacqueline and 
> schedule the
>  >> Meeting.
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> Best regards
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> Alberto Soto
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> ---
>  Avast antivirus software >> esta email scanned for viruses.
>  >> <Http://www.avast.com>Http://www.avast.com
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >
>  >
>  >
>
>
>

[[--Original text (en)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/3c3404910f.html
--]]