Examen Final - Miembro de la elección de ALAC (Parte 2)
cintra.sooknanan en gmail.com
cintra.sooknanan en gmail.com
Vie Ago 17 15:31:08 UTC 2012
[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]
Asunto: Re: Examen Final - Miembro de la elección de ALAC (Parte 2)
De: cintra.sooknanan en gmail.com
Así que dejemos de patear a un lado a otro.
José por este correo electrónico que considere su posición basada en la opinión personal de la ICANN y sobre la base de la división de opiniones ... solicitud de que usted y nuestra secretaria iniciar una votación sobre la inclusión o eliminación del candidato.
Saludos
Cintra
Enviado desde mi dispositivo inalámbrico BlackBerry disponible desde bmobile.
----- Mensaje original -----
De: Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels en gmail.com>
Remitente: lac-discuss-en-bounces en atlarge-lists.icann.org
Date: Fri, 17 de agosto 2012 08:29:39
Para: Webmaster <rok en bango.org.bb>
Cc: <lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org>
Asunto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] Examen Final - Miembro de ALAC
Elecciones (Parte 2)
República de Corea,
Si sigo tu razonamiento, nadie tiene la responsabilidad de ver la retinopatía del prematuro es
obedecido.
Y en el caso de una violación, todo el mundo tiene el deber de sentarse en sus manos.
No mi hermano, alguien debe hacer la llamada.Ese es un papel para el
presidir oficial.
Y si no está de acuerdo en la llamada, tenemos una manera de resolver ese desacuerdo.
Convocatoria de una división y recuento de los votos.
- Carlton
==============================
Carlton Samuels A
Móvil: 876-818-1799
* Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y plazos *
=============================
El Jue, 16 de agosto 2012 a las 11:09 PM, Webmaster <rok en bango.org.bb> escribió:
> Carlton,
>
> My understanding of a petition is that you have a grievance. Then you have
> to get a certain amount of members to agree to back the petition before it
> becomes valid. This depends on so many factors that for a chair to make a
> decision that requires members to petition should be a decision of a
> serious nature and not one so simplistic and obvious that does not even
> require a decision by the Chair. The Chair is sticking his neck out and I
> am not going to validate executive authority where it does not exist.
>
> ROK
>
> *From:* Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels en gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 16, 2012 11:49 PM
> *To:* Webmaster <rok en bango.org.bb>
> *Cc:* Jacqueline Morris <jam en jacquelinemorris.com> ;
> lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [lac-discuss-en] Final Consideration - Member of ALAC
> Election(Part 2)
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Webmaster <rok en bango.org.bb> wrote:
>
>> the Chair has a right to interpret rules carte blanche.
>>
>
> We do not accept our Chair as if he was the Bishop of Rome; infallible in
> all things.
>
> As the presiding officer, the Chair's principal role is to interpret rules
> but not 'carte blanche'. He is constrained by the RoP in the first
> instance.
>
> Here's the good thing. Every other member also has an unfettered right to
> interpret said rules.
>
> And since for our purposes, the Chair is and must be a member in ordinary,
> every other member has the right to challenge any and every interpretation
> of the Chair.
>
> Here's the kicker. Every member retains the absolute right to petition
> every other member to your point of view. We call that a vote.
>
> I say again, if you fell aggrieved by the declaration, then there is a
> remedy. Exercise it if you must.
>
> - CAS
>
>
>
>
> ==============================
> Carlton A Samuels
> Mobile: 876-818-1799
> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
> =============================
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2012.0.2197 / Virus Database: 2437/5204 - Release Date: 08/16/12
>
>
[[--Original text (en)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/997b9dd904.html
--]]
Más información sobre la lista de distribución lac-discuss-es