[IDN-WG] [Ext] Re: ACTION/IDN WG by 27 March - Script Root Zone Label Generation Rules PCs
evin.erdogdu at icann.org
Fri Mar 27 20:34:51 UTC 2020
?Thank you, Satish - well noted.
From: Satish Babu <sb at inapp.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2020 2:30 AM
To: Evin Erdogdu
Cc: idn-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org; Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond; Jonathan Zuck; ICANN At-Large Staff
Subject: [Ext] Re: ACTION/IDN WG by 27 March - Script Root Zone Label Generation Rules PCs
Dear IDN WG members,
As a practice, ALAC does not usually comment on RZ LGR proposals, unless there is a special reason to do so. We do, however, encourage our members who belong to the respective language communities to consider providing comments.
Therefore, we do not think an ALAC statement is necessary for these two cases. Pls let us know if you think otherwise.
With kind regards,
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 3:35 AM Evin Erdogdu <evin.erdogdu at icann.org<mailto:evin.erdogdu at icann.org>> wrote:
Dear At-Large IDN WG Mailing List Members,
During the CPWG Meeting today, the two ICANN Public Comments on Proposal for Chinese Script Root Zone? Label Generation Rules<https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=126427508> & Proposal for Bangla Script Root Zone? Label Generation Rules<https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=126429100> were discussed.
The CPWG wanted to request that the At-Large IDN WG indicate whether they believe ALAC should issue a statement on one or both of these Public Comments, since IDNs are a topic of interest within the At-Large community.
If you would like to volunteer to contribute to an ALAC statement on either of these ICANN Public Comments, please let staff know by this Friday, 27 March 23:59 UTC.
More information about the IDN-WG