[IDN-WG] [At-Large] The New gTLD Progam in CLASS IN is no more a swindle
avri at acm.org
Wed Jan 11 17:07:20 UTC 2012
Two questions on this.
- wouldn't he be looking for support of these new Classes in addition to Class IN, not instead?
- doesn't this break because DNS Alias records pay no attention to Class and therefore aliased names would collide despite being in different classes?
On 11 Jan 2012, at 11:47, Lutz Donnerhacke wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 04:32:48PM +0100, JFC Morfin wrote:
>> This simply means that for each ".abcd" top-zone IDNgTLD paid K$ 185++
>> to ICANN, there can be 65,535 other ".abcd" top-zones in the DNS. Some
>> will be immediatel because the IUTF is going to accept a few CLASSes
>> for family protection, customer documentation, testing of third party
>> applications, etc.
> You only need to register the CLASS according to RFC6195 Section 3.2.
> Then you need to distribute an additional "root hint" file pointing to your
> new root servers (similar to http://www.internic.net/domain/named.root)
> As you can see, they only claim to be responsible for ./IN.
> Then you can start selling domains from your new root.
> Please allow me to add a professional advice. If you try to convince the
> browser manufacturers to ask for your class instead of IN, you might have a
> real market.
> Lutz Donnerhacke
> Maintainer of the TLD bofh.
> bofh. IN SOA jengate.thur.de. hostmaster.bofh. (
> 2012011100 ; serial
> 28800 ; refresh (8 hours)
> 3600 ; retry (1 hour)
> 3600000 ; expire (5 weeks 6 days 16 hours)
> 57600 ; minimum (16 hours)
> bofh. IN RRSIG SOA 5 1 86400 20120120091622 (
> 20120111101001 43652 bofh.
> mOblQQmy3PKHrgRiA84UoOEWeJeGLExjST15oqY= )
> At-Large mailing list
> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
More information about the IDN-WG