<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
      charset=windows-1252">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 31/12/21 4:26 am, Jeff Neuman via
      At-Large wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:BL3P221MB0663C83A74BDD7D95490A967BE459@BL3P221MB0663.NAMP221.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
        charset=windows-1252">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div>
          <div dir="ltr">FYI, I have updated my At-Large SOI and GNSO
            SOI to disclose the propose future role as Chief Legal
            Officer of Dot Hip Hop, LLC the future registry operator for
            .hiphop.</div>
          <div dir="ltr"><br>
          </div>
          <div dir="ltr">I apologize for not having done this before,
            but I was waiting for the assignment to be approved.  We
            filed it 141 days ago.</div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <p>A conflict of interest does not arise when you are actually
      officially assigned a position etc, it arises when you start to
      engage with an activity -- applying for the assignment in this
      instance -- that, as here, directly conflicts with your public
      interest roles in At-Large , GNSO etc.To explain further if this
      is still unclear to you: At-Large and GNSO need to know it when
      you were actively pursing some commercial interests in applying
      for a gLTD etc, and not latter when it is already assigned. Is it
      not so very simple and straight-forward! </p>
    <p>How the 'multistakeholderist community' reads this democratic
      vestige of the idea of 'conflict of interest' is absolutely a
      disgrace, and dishonor to all those who fought for and built
      democracies. As I read Jeff's email below of Dec 30th, my head
      spins as to how hallowed concepts like 'conflict of interest' can
      be mauled in self-defense. <br>
    </p>
    <p>(It is the MSist sin when they conflated corporate governance
      with public governance, whereby the thin half ethics of the former
      are employed as the foundations for what has to be public
      governance of some public functions. Although these practices do
      not pass even the light corporate governance ethical tests.) <br>
    </p>
    <p>To have someone so deeply involved with shaping new forms and
      business models of gTLD, and making direct money out of it, as
      GNSO's liaison to GAC and to ICANN stuff -- nothing personal here,
      but it makes my democratic guts retch in sheer horror. This is
      multistakeholderism for you! A pall bearer for the elite who have
      always felt popular democracy as a thorn in their side!</p>
    <p>parminder</p>
    <p>PS: As should be obvious, I have nothing against people dong
      businesses like Jeff is into, but wanting to then also be one of
      the key people in regulation/ governance systems for those
      business is what absolutely gets my goat.</p>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:BL3P221MB0663C83A74BDD7D95490A967BE459@BL3P221MB0663.NAMP221.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div>
          <div dir="ltr"><span></span><span></span></div>
          <div id="ms-outlook-mobile-signature">
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div style="direction:ltr">Jeffrey J. Neuman</div>
            <div style="direction:ltr">Founder & CEO</div>
            <div style="direction:ltr">JJN Solutions, LLC</div>
            <div style="direction:ltr"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Jeff@JJNSolutions.com">Jeff@JJNSolutions.com</a></div>
            <div style="direction:ltr">+1.202.549.5079</div>
            <div style="direction:ltr"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="Http://www.jjnsolutions.com">Http://www.jjnsolutions.com</a></div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
        <div id="id-182af636-f0c8-495b-8930-4939370b6558"
          class="ms-outlook-mobile-reference-message">
          <hr style="display: inline-block; width: 98%; font-family:
            -webkit-standard; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"
            tabindex="-1">
          <div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri,
              sans-serif"><b>From:</b> At-Large
              <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:at-large-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org"><at-large-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org></a> on behalf
              of Jeff Neuman via At-Large
              <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org"><at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org></a><br>
              <b>Sent:</b> Thursday, December 30, 2021 3:18 PM<br>
              <b>To:</b> Hank Nussbacher;
              <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org">at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org</a><br>
              <b>Subject:</b> Re: [At-Large] ICANN Accountability
              Mechanisms
              <div> </div>
            </font></div>
          <div>
            <div>
              <div dir="ltr" style="">
                <div dir="ltr" style="color:rgb(0,0,0);
                  background-color:rgb(255,255,255)">Good Questions
                  Hank.</div>
                <div dir="ltr" style="color:rgb(0,0,0);
                  background-color:rgb(255,255,255)"><br>
                </div>
                <div dir="ltr" style="color:rgb(0,0,0);
                  background-color:rgb(255,255,255)">
                  <ol>
                    <li><span> The issues with .hiphop are contained in
                        the Reconsideration Request found here:  <a
href="https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/reconsideration-21-3-dot-hip-hop-request-2021-12-16-en"
                          moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/reconsideration-21-3-dot-hip-hop-request-2021-12-16-en</a>.
                         I am not avoiding answering the question, but
                        there are 25 pages of issues and an addition
                        dozen or so other pages of facts.  </span></li>
                    <li><span>I do not believe that my position with Dot
                        Hip Hop, LLC as its Chief Legal Officer and
                        owner of a small minority interest of the
                        company presents a conflict.  I was put in those
                        positions (especially the ODP Liaison) because
                        of my knowledge, skill, and experience with the
                        PDP for the next round.  (Dot Hip Hop, LLC was
                        in the 2012 round).  One other note, I did not
                        update my Statement of Interest because I was
                        waiting for the actual approval of the
                        assignment request before disclosing.  Since Dot
                        Hip Hop, LLC is a shell entity without any
                        assets until ICANN approves the assignment, I
                        didn’t disclose.  ICANN was supposed to have
                        approved the Assignment request in October and
                        if they had met their own deadline, I would have
                        disclosed my position prior to getting those
                        positions. I have committed to performing those
                        roles with independence, openness an
                        transparency and believe that I have done that
                        to date.  If anyone believes otherwise, I would
                        be happy to address, and if required, would step
                        down.  I am not being paid by anyone in serving
                        in these leadership roles and do them both on a
                        volunteer basis.  I like to serve the ICANN
                        Community and would like to continue to make it
                        a better place.  But, it is volunteer work that
                        I would give up if anyone honestly believes
                        there is a conflict.  If you have any concerns,
                        let me know. I truly am an open book.  I think
                        at one time ICANN called me a “Bad M$#%F#$%”
                        because I tell everyone exactly what is on my
                        mind.  I dont believe in secrets (unless
                        required by law or in serving as an attorney)</span></li>
                    <li style="font-size:inherit"><span
                        style="font-size:inherit">LOL on 4 months vs 4
                        years.   THe average turnaround time for an
                        assignment request for the big players is less
                        than 60 days.  </span></li>
                  </ol>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
            <div id="ms-outlook-mobile-signature">
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div style="direction:ltr">Jeffrey J. Neuman</div>
              <div style="direction:ltr">Founder & CEO</div>
              <div style="direction:ltr">JJN Solutions, LLC</div>
              <div style="direction:ltr"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Jeff@JJNSolutions.com">Jeff@JJNSolutions.com</a></div>
              <div style="direction:ltr">+1.202.549.5079</div>
              <div style="direction:ltr"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="Http://www.jjnsolutions.com">Http://www.jjnsolutions.com</a></div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
          <hr tabindex="-1" style="display:inline-block; width:98%">
          <div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font style="font-size:11pt"
              face="Calibri, sans-serif" color="#000000"><b>From:</b>
              At-Large <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:at-large-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org"><at-large-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org></a>
              on behalf of Hank Nussbacher via At-Large
              <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org"><at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org></a><br>
              <b>Sent:</b> Thursday, December 30, 2021 1:01:41 PM<br>
              <b>To:</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org">at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org</a>
              <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org"><at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org></a><br>
              <b>Subject:</b> Re: [At-Large] ICANN Accountability
              Mechanisms</font>
            <div> </div>
          </div>
          <div class="BodyFragment"><font size="2"><span
                style="font-size:11pt">
                <div class="PlainText">On 30/12/2021 17:46, Jeff Neuman
                  via At-Large wrote:<br>
                  <br>
                  I have no opinion on this matter but have a few newbie
                  questions:<br>
                  <br>
                  1.  Based on <a href="https://icannwiki.org/.hiphop"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">https://icannwiki.org/.hiphop</a>
                  - what is the issue with
                  <br>
                  .hiphop?<br>
                  2.  Based on <br>
                  <a
href="https://www.jjnsolutions.com/post/jeffrey-j-neuman-appointed-to-internet-leadership-positions-at-icann-72"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.jjnsolutions.com/post/jeffrey-j-neuman-appointed-to-internet-leadership-positions-at-icann-72</a>
                  <br>
                  isn't it a conflict of interest on your part?<br>
                  3.  Based on <br>
                  <a
href="https://circleid.com/posts/20211230-icannas-accountability-mechanisms-in-name-only"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">https://circleid.com/posts/20211230-icannas-accountability-mechanisms-in-name-only</a>
                  <br>
                  you state "following ICANN staff inaction (for its
                  over four-month <br>
                  delay) of its Assignment Request for the .hiphop
                  Registry Agreement." - <br>
                  based on my experience with ICANN processes, a 4 month
                  delay is a mere <br>
                  second in ICANN time. I would start complaining only
                  after 4 years.<br>
                  <br>
                  Regards,<br>
                  Hank<br>
                  <br>
                  NB The opinions or lack of opinions expressed above
                  are solely my own<br>
                  <br>
                  > All,<br>
                  ><br>
                  > I thought this was important enough of an issue
                  to be discussed and I <br>
                  > am happy to answer any questions you may have.<br>
                  ><br>
                  > Please <br>
                  >
seehttps://circleid.com/posts/20211230-icannas-accountability-mechanisms-in-name-only<br>
                  > <<a
href="https://circleid.com/posts/20211230-icannas-accountability-mechanisms-in-name-only"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">https://circleid.com/posts/20211230-icannas-accountability-mechanisms-in-name-only</a>>.
                  <br>
                  ><br>
                  ><br>
                  ><br>
                  > This article covers ICANN’s taking retaliatory
                  action against a <br>
                  > company I am involved in for daring to use the
                  Reconsideration <br>
                  > Process. We alleged ICANN’s inaction was a
                  violation of the Bylaws <br>
                  > (and you can read about that separately).<br>
                  ><br>
                  ><br>
                  > What does ICANN do? It “pauses” its consideration
                  of what it has <br>
                  > failed to act on in retaliation against my
                  company thereby compounding <br>
                  > the original issue. In other words, we complained
                  ICANN was moving to <br>
                  > slow in our request for the assignment of a TLD
                  Agreement - and that <br>
                  > was a violation of the Bylaws. ICANN has
                  responded by stating that it <br>
                  > now needs to halt all consideration of the
                  assignment request because <br>
                  > we filed the Reconsideration Action in order to
                  investigate the basis <br>
                  > of our claims that it was moving too slow.<br>
                  ><br>
                  ><br>
                  > ———————<br>
                  ><br>
                  ><br>
                  > There will be a follow up post on why our initial
                  request for urgent <br>
                  > reconsideration was denied.  In short, ICANN has
                  taken the position that:<br>
                  ><br>
                  ><br>
                  > A). Only ICANN Board Action can be challenged on
                  an Urgent Basis.  <br>
                  > ICANN staff Action or inaction may not be.<br>
                  ><br>
                  ><br>
                  > B). And ICANN Board Inaction cannot be challenged
                  where the basis for <br>
                  > the “Inaction” is ICANN’s failure to pass a Board
                  Resolution. In other <br>
                  > words, if you are angry at the Board for not
                  passing a resolution, you <br>
                  > cannot file an urgent reconsideration
                  request…..why…..because in order <br>
                  > to have an urgent Reconsideration Request, there
                  needs to be an actual <br>
                  > Board Resolution. Thus, if the board fails to
                  pass a resolution, by <br>
                  > definition, there is no resolution on which to
                  basis the urgent action.<br>
                  ><br>
                  ><br>
                  > ————-<br>
                  ><br>
                  > This case also covers ICANN’s misguided fight
                  against the blockchain. <br>
                  >  Although the request to assign .hiphop has
                  nothing to do with the <br>
                  > blockchain, ICANN has decided (wrongfully) that
                  it does.<br>
                  ><br>
                  ><br>
                  > ——————<br>
                  ><br>
                  ><br>
                  > If you want to cover any of this in an open
                  session, I am more than <br>
                  > happy to discuss.  I believe all of this should
                  be done in the open <br>
                  > and if ICANN Org is not going to be completely
                  open and transparent, <br>
                  > then there is no reason we cannot be.<br>
                  ><br>
                  ><br>
                  > Sincerely,<br>
                  ><br>
                  ><br>
                  ><br>
                  > Jeffrey J. Neuman<br>
                  > Founder & CEO<br>
                  > JJN Solutions, LLC<br>
                  > <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Jeff@JJNSolutions.com">Jeff@JJNSolutions.com</a><br>
                  > +1.202.549.5079<br>
                  > <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="Http://www.jjnsolutions.com">Http://www.jjnsolutions.com</a><br>
                  ><br>
                  ><br>
                  ><br>
                  > _______________________________________________<br>
                  > At-Large mailing list<br>
                  > <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org">At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org</a><br>
                  > <a
                    href="https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large</a><br>
                  ><br>
                  > At-Large Official Site: <a
                    href="http://atlarge.icann.org"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">http://atlarge.icann.org</a><br>
                  > _______________________________________________<br>
                  > By submitting your personal data, you consent to
                  the processing of your personal data for purposes of
                  subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the
                  ICANN Privacy Policy (<a
                    href="https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy</a>)
                  and the website Terms of Service (<a
                    href="https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos</a>).
                  You can visit the Mailman link above to change your
                  membership status or configuration, including
                  unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
                  disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation),
                  and so on.<br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  _______________________________________________<br>
                  At-Large mailing list<br>
                  <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org">At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org</a><br>
                  <a
                    href="https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large</a><br>
                  <br>
                  At-Large Official Site: <a
                    href="http://atlarge.icann.org"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">http://atlarge.icann.org</a><br>
                  _______________________________________________<br>
                  By submitting your personal data, you consent to the
                  processing of your personal data for purposes of
                  subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the
                  ICANN Privacy Policy (<a
                    href="https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy</a>)
                  and the website Terms of Service (<a
                    href="https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos</a>).
                  You can visit the Mailman link above to change your
                  membership status or configuration, including
                  unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
                  disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation),
                  and so on.</div>
              </span></font></div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
At-Large mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org">At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large">https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large</a>

At-Large Official Site: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://atlarge.icann.org">http://atlarge.icann.org</a>
_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy">https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy</a>) and the website Terms of Service (<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos">https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos</a>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.</pre>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>