[At-Large] In progress (call set up) ACTION: HR/R/MdS/SV - OFB WG meeting this week
Gisella Gruber
Gisella.Gruber at icann.org
Mon Dec 19 08:25:06 UTC 2022
Dear Holly and Ricardo,
Unless we hear otherwise over the next few hours, we will get this call set up for Thursday 22 December at 18:00 UTC, noting that we have not yet had interpretation confirmed.
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Gisella
On 19/12/2022, 06:37, "Heidi Ullrich" <Heidi.Ullrich at icann.org> wrote:
Hi Holly and Ricardo,
Thank you for your note, Holly. Will a 60 min call be sufficient for the OFB-WG call?
Michelle will be setting the call up the call. Would Thursday, 22 Dec at 18:00 UTC be a good time for everyone?
Silvia will send you the draft agenda based on the outline you provided in your note.
Kind regards,
Heidi
On 12/18/22, 6:09 PM, "Holly Raiche" <h.raiche at internode.on.net> wrote:
Staff/Folks
Issues:
Draft Operating and Financial Plans for FY 24-28 and FY 24
has been released
Comments due 13 February
ABRs -
Generally open for submissions end of December
Process - requests from RALOs
Grants program
I’ve had q quick look at the Budget documentation and started making notes for discussion. If it isn’t too onerous for people, I’d like a meeting this week - usual time. I realize this is really close to Christmas, but the comments for the budget are due 13 Feb. and if we don’t start the discussion soon, it will be mid-January before we meet - and then have not a lot of time to develop a draft, allow for comments and then vote.
We should also start people thinking about ABRs. The process starts with the RALOs - but we should perhaps have a brief discussion and review principles since, in the end, it will come back to the FSBC (or the OFB WG) to review. And maybe also RALO chairs to attend?
Finally, a quick discussion abut the grants program. There is only a tiny sum to be allocated in this coming year, but a review of the processes would be useful
My quick comments on the actual budget - I’m sure Ricardo will talk about - yet again- growth in the personnel. If it is explained by the drop in professional services, I’m happy. Otherwise - why? I also note there isn’t much change in travel - but we are moving to 3 F2F meetings? Also there is budget allocation for 29 people (or so it looks) for each of the 3 meetings (not sure why that isn’t 25 - who are the extra 4? - not a complaint, by the way)
An Marita particularly, once again, what we get is a global figure against initiatives with little guidance on how that money will achieve the outcomes - and therefore, no way to test how the money was spent and how/whether outcomes were achieved.
I”ll keep reading but, unless I hear otherwise, please ASAP - a notice of an OFB WG meeting THIS WEEK -
Thanks
Holly
More information about the At-Large
mailing list