[At-Large] ATLASIII Participation

[Alberto Soto]

For Atlas II, no metrics had been reported. For Atlas III, yes, and they were made explicit with sufficient time. And regardless of whether we knew something or not, the content of webinars or courses, as Olivier said, it is always good to learn something. and conform to the rules, it is much better.

Regards

 

Alberto

 

De: At-Large <at-large-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org> en nombre de Sergio Salinas Porto <presidencia at internauta.org.ar>
Fecha: domingo, 14 de julio de 2019, 10:32
Para: Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob at gmail.com>
CC: At-Large Worldwide <at-large at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
Asunto: Re: [At-Large] ATLASIII Participation

 

Dear friends, I agree with humberto, I think 3 years are not enough.

I have seen in the list, people who were in London in 2014 who literally went on vacation to Great Britain. 

I believe that the path should be a sanction ranging from Atlas III to IV (included), without any funding in between.

Regards

Sergio Salinas Porto
Presidente Internauta Argentina - LACRALO/ICANN 
Asociación Argentina de Usuarios de Internet/FeTIA
FUILAC- Federación de Usuarios de Internet de LAC
facebook: salinasporto
twitter: sergiosalinas 
Mobi:+54 9 223 5 215819
"Ojalá podamos ser desobedientes, cada vez que recibimos órdenes que humillan nuestra conciencia o violan nuestro sentido común" Eduardo Galeano

Mostrar texto citado

    

 

El mar., 9 jul. 2019 11:40, Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob at gmail.com> escribió:

Dear John,


I am with you. I believe there is all travellers must comply with Atlas III goals. Travelling to Canada is not a vacation. However, instead of saying 3 years, I would say for any ICANN funding for 5 years or the next ATLAS meeting. If I remember well the last ATLAS meeting was 2014 (5 years ago)

Regards

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/at-large/attachments/20190714/3d63c8d0/attachment.html>