[At-Large] Fwd: ATLASIII Participation
carlton.samuels at gmail.com
Sat Jul 13 17:49:17 UTC 2019
Here you are again, Karl, with the vision of the third eye!
*Carlton A Samuels*
*Mobile: 876-818-1799Strategy, Process, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 2:41 PM Karl Auerbach <karl at cavebear.com> wrote:
> On 7/12/19 5:53 AM, Christian de Larrinaga wrote:
> > In no way to detract from any point you are making. But this is the
> > first I've heard about ATLAS participation or these ICANN courses. I
> > also have no idea whether this matters in the slightest.
> I, as well, found these requirements surprising. They reminded me of
> 19th century European sovereigns who claimed that their colonial
> governments in Africa were necessary because the people there were
> incapable of deciding questions that were important to their own lives.
> Yes, that is a harsh assessment. But imposition of participation
> requirements, such as mandatory education, smacks of "top down" management.
> Yes, people who don't know the lingo of the meeting do slow things
> down. But ICANN has been wandering around, doing essentially little
> except promote certain intellectual property and business interests for
> more than two decades. "Efficient" is not a word that seems to exist in
> the ICANN universe.
> Why not a list of suggested readings rather than a mandatory gauntlet?
> Much of the potential of ICANN is not in following the deeply rutted
> path of what ICANN has done over the last two decades but, rather, in
> what is possible when one explores the green fields to the sides of the
> old road.
> Mandatory courses can be blinders - devices used on horses so that they
> could see only what was in front of them, not to the sides.
> Those mandatory courses tell potential participants what has been; not
> what is possible.
> Nor are those courses complete. For instance, is there material that
> explains how (or why) ICANN arrived at the present Byzantine structure
> or what the alternatives were (and perhaps still are)?
> Those courses reminded me of when I started in the field of networking
> that we had to learn about circuits and BiSync and HASP because that was
> the way thing were done. It was revolutionaries like Luis Pouzin, Don
> Davies, and Paul Baran who said "we don't need circuits, packets are
> sufficient" that broke us out of the status quo and led to the
> end-to-end principle and the internet.
> (There are even more harsh assessments of imposed orthodoxy. I am
> reminded of Mao's Red Book [which was pilloried in a great aria -
> https://youtu.be/TyiKxltknZI ].)
> At-Large mailing list
> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the At-Large