[At-Large] ATLASIII Participation

[Evan Leibovitch]

On Fri, 12 Jul 2019 at 09:17, Roberto Gaetano <roberto_gaetano at hotmail.com>
wrote:


> While I may agree with you that ICAN is by and large insufficient as a
> forum where the users’ voice is represented, I cannot think of another
> venue where we could have a different situation. If you have an idea,
> please share it.
>

Having a process that embeds and demands a public interest component into
each ITU delegation is looking better every day.

Also, the pre-ALAC way to have the public elect the ICANN Board -- a board
not obligated to accept GNSO edicts -- would be a good step.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/at-large/attachments/20190712/0d126cc3/attachment.html>