William Michael Cunningham williamcunningham840 at gmail.com
Fri Dec 8 01:39:28 UTC 2017

Your response is unclear. Clarify please.

On Dec 7, 2017 7:57 PM, "Carlton Samuels" <carlton.samuels at gmail.com> wrote:

> I understand.  It is also entirely reasonable to experience a subject
> (coordination of the unique identifiers)/predicate (for a stable and secure
> DNS) dissonance.
> -Carlton
> ==============================
> *Carlton A Samuels*
> *Mobile: 876-818-1799 <(876)%20818-1799>Strategy, Planning, Governance,
> Assessment & Turnaround*
> =============================
> On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 6:39 PM, William Michael Cunningham <
> williamcunningham840 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Even if I believed this incorporated the totality of the ICANN mission,
>> which I do not, "stable and secure" is the operative phrase. Removing nn at
>> the FCC is a destabilizing policy change, in much the same way that
>> removing glass steagal was destabilizing to the financial marketplace.
>> On Dec 7, 2017 6:32 PM, "Carlton Samuels" <carlton.samuels at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Just seeing this.  ICANN's remit is coordinating the Internet's unique
>>> identifiers in furtherance of a stable and secure domain name system.
>>> While interesting and even mildly entertaining, the FCC's NN malarkey is
>>> decidedly outside the ICANN remit.
>>> -Carlton
>>> ==============================
>>> *Carlton A Samuels*
>>> *Mobile: 876-818-1799 <(876)%20818-1799>Strategy, Planning, Governance,
>>> Assessment & Turnaround*
>>> =============================
>>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 2:07 PM, William Michael Cunningham <
>>> williamcunningham840 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> A reading of the FCC Net Neutrality order clearly reveals how impactful
>>>> this order will be on ICANN's stated mission and goals. A focus on
>>>> technical aspects of  the operation of the Internet's identifiers is
>>>> incorrect. Such a focus is simply too narrow, driven and suggested by a
>>>> small group of mainly non-minority individuals who appear to support the
>>>> financial interests of their group, and their group alone. This
>>>> entirely monetary focus is contrary to ICANN's desire to facilitate
>>>> discussion by all internet users in matters of national internet policy
>>>> development.
>>>> Here are some other factors:
>>>> "Security and Stability"
>>>> "Diversity - income, gender race."
>>>> "Competition, Consumer Trust and Consumer Choice" Clearly, the order
>>>> will impact each of these areas separately and jointly.
>>>> I suggest a formal process for obtaining opinions from the At-large
>>>> group about perspective on the proposed FCC policy, not short circuiting
>>>> discussion by listening to the opinions of a small group of insiders.
>>>> In other words, why don't we ask people what they think, instead of
>>>> telling them that the FCC policy is irrelevant?
>>>> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 10:08 PM, William Michael Cunningham <
>>>> williamcunningham840 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Clearly, you have not looked at this or the previous order and I have
>>>>> no interest in doing it for you. I'd also suggest you look at the video of
>>>>> the prior net neutrality hearing under the previous Chair. Since I was at
>>>>> that meeting, I can confirm that your concerns were noted quite indelibly.
>>>>> On Dec 4, 2017 10:01 PM, "John R. Levine" <johnl at iecc.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Interesting. Suggest you look again.
>>>>>> Thanks for confirming that we have both looked at each of the 125
>>>>>> paragraphs of the FCC's recent order, as well as Appendices A and B, and
>>>>>> the statements of the various commissioners and we agree that there is
>>>>>> nothing affecting the operation of the Internet's identfiers that would be
>>>>>> relevant to ICANN.
>>>>>> R's,
>>>>>> John
>>>> --
>>>> Minority and Women-owned Company Small Business Financing Guide and
>>>> Workbook: https://www.minorityfinance.com/mfinform1.html
>>>> Twitter: @CreativeInv
>>>> My new book: The JOBS Act: Crowdfunding for Small Businesses and
>>>> Startups
>>>> https://www.amazon.com/JOBS-Act-Crowdfunding-Businesses-Star
>>>> tups/dp/1484224086/
>>>> 202-455-0430 <(202)%20455-0430>
>>>> "Evil is not driven out, but crowded out...through the expulsive power
>>>> of something good. " MLK
>>>> This communication (including all pages in this email and any attached
>>>> document) are for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain
>>>> confidential information. Unauthorized use, distribution, disclosure or any
>>>> action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on this document is
>>>> prohibited, and may be unlawful.  By inadvertent disclosure of this
>>>> document Creative Investment Research, Inc. and William Michael Cunningham
>>>> do not waive confidentiality privilege with respect hereto. This
>>>> writing/publication is a creative work fully protected by all applicable
>>>> copyright laws, as well as by misappropriation, trade secret, unfair
>>>> competition and other applicable laws. No copyright is claimed in the text
>>>> of statutes, regulations, and any excerpts from others’ reports or articles
>>>> quoted within this work. Copyright©2017 by William Michael Cunningham and
>>>> Creative Investment Research, Inc. All rights reserved – including the
>>>> right to reproduce in whole or in part in any form.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> At-Large mailing list
>>>> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
>>>> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/at-large/attachments/20171207/49d2f7c8/attachment.html>

More information about the At-Large mailing list