[At-Large] FCC TO SCRAP NET NEUTRALITY
carlton.samuels at gmail.com
Fri Dec 8 00:56:33 UTC 2017
I understand. It is also entirely reasonable to experience a subject
(coordination of the unique identifiers)/predicate (for a stable and secure
*Carlton A Samuels*
*Mobile: 876-818-1799Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment &
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 6:39 PM, William Michael Cunningham <
williamcunningham840 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Even if I believed this incorporated the totality of the ICANN mission,
> which I do not, "stable and secure" is the operative phrase. Removing nn at
> the FCC is a destabilizing policy change, in much the same way that
> removing glass steagal was destabilizing to the financial marketplace.
> On Dec 7, 2017 6:32 PM, "Carlton Samuels" <carlton.samuels at gmail.com>
>> Just seeing this. ICANN's remit is coordinating the Internet's unique
>> identifiers in furtherance of a stable and secure domain name system.
>> While interesting and even mildly entertaining, the FCC's NN malarkey is
>> decidedly outside the ICANN remit.
>> *Carlton A Samuels*
>> *Mobile: 876-818-1799 <(876)%20818-1799>Strategy, Planning, Governance,
>> Assessment & Turnaround*
>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 2:07 PM, William Michael Cunningham <
>> williamcunningham840 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> A reading of the FCC Net Neutrality order clearly reveals how impactful
>>> this order will be on ICANN's stated mission and goals. A focus on
>>> technical aspects of the operation of the Internet's identifiers is
>>> incorrect. Such a focus is simply too narrow, driven and suggested by a
>>> small group of mainly non-minority individuals who appear to support the
>>> financial interests of their group, and their group alone. This
>>> entirely monetary focus is contrary to ICANN's desire to facilitate
>>> discussion by all internet users in matters of national internet policy
>>> Here are some other factors:
>>> "Security and Stability"
>>> "Diversity - income, gender race."
>>> "Competition, Consumer Trust and Consumer Choice" Clearly, the order
>>> will impact each of these areas separately and jointly.
>>> I suggest a formal process for obtaining opinions from the At-large
>>> group about perspective on the proposed FCC policy, not short circuiting
>>> discussion by listening to the opinions of a small group of insiders.
>>> In other words, why don't we ask people what they think, instead of
>>> telling them that the FCC policy is irrelevant?
>>> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 10:08 PM, William Michael Cunningham <
>>> williamcunningham840 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Clearly, you have not looked at this or the previous order and I have
>>>> no interest in doing it for you. I'd also suggest you look at the video of
>>>> the prior net neutrality hearing under the previous Chair. Since I was at
>>>> that meeting, I can confirm that your concerns were noted quite indelibly.
>>>> On Dec 4, 2017 10:01 PM, "John R. Levine" <johnl at iecc.com> wrote:
>>>>> Interesting. Suggest you look again.
>>>>> Thanks for confirming that we have both looked at each of the 125
>>>>> paragraphs of the FCC's recent order, as well as Appendices A and B, and
>>>>> the statements of the various commissioners and we agree that there is
>>>>> nothing affecting the operation of the Internet's identfiers that would be
>>>>> relevant to ICANN.
>>> Minority and Women-owned Company Small Business Financing Guide and
>>> Workbook: https://www.minorityfinance.com/mfinform1.html
>>> Twitter: @CreativeInv
>>> My new book: The JOBS Act: Crowdfunding for Small Businesses and Startups
>>> 202-455-0430 <(202)%20455-0430>
>>> "Evil is not driven out, but crowded out...through the expulsive power
>>> of something good. " MLK
>>> This communication (including all pages in this email and any attached
>>> document) are for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain
>>> confidential information. Unauthorized use, distribution, disclosure or any
>>> action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on this document is
>>> prohibited, and may be unlawful. By inadvertent disclosure of this
>>> document Creative Investment Research, Inc. and William Michael Cunningham
>>> do not waive confidentiality privilege with respect hereto. This
>>> writing/publication is a creative work fully protected by all applicable
>>> copyright laws, as well as by misappropriation, trade secret, unfair
>>> competition and other applicable laws. No copyright is claimed in the text
>>> of statutes, regulations, and any excerpts from others’ reports or articles
>>> quoted within this work. Copyright©2017 by William Michael Cunningham and
>>> Creative Investment Research, Inc. All rights reserved – including the
>>> right to reproduce in whole or in part in any form.
>>> At-Large mailing list
>>> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the At-Large