[At-Large] FCC TO SCRAP NET NEUTRALITY, ICANN NOT AFFECTED.
John R. Levine
johnl at iecc.com
Tue Dec 5 03:37:24 UTC 2017
In the unlikely event that anyone's still interested, the FCC's new order
only mentions the DNS in three places, in paragraphs 28, 29, and 37. The
context is that ISPs often run a DNS cache as an ancillary service, and it
asks what difference it would make if they didn't, presumably directing
their users to a third party service like 8.8.8.8 or 9.9.9.9. While
that's a semi-interesting question in trying to decide whether ISPs are a
telecom or enhanced service, it has, as I've repeatedly pointed out,
nothing to do with ICANN and its oversight of domain name management.
IP addresses are mentioned in paragraph 29, as what the DNS translates
names to, and in Commisioner Clyburn's comments in passing in a discussion
about what counts as a CMRS (mobile phone service) amd a few places
indirectly in that ISPs sometiems do NAT (local IP address translation.)
Again, semi-interesting in context, but nothing to do with anything ICANN
does.
So again, why are we even talking about this in an ICANN forum? I'll stop
now.
R's,
John
PS: I guess the message here is that if someone can't tell you what parts
of a document he's read, you can safely assume he hasn't read it.
More information about the At-Large
mailing list