[At-Large] Auction Proceeds - where we are and what you can help
León Felipe Sánchez Ambía
leonfelipe at sanchez.mx
Fri May 12 19:46:16 UTC 2017
Completely agree with Vanda, Carlton and Ed.
Best regards,
León
> El 12/05/2017, a las 13:57, Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels at gmail.com> escribió:
>
> +++1 to Vanda's three! In my humble view we don't need to be more detailed.
>
> All that now needs thrashing is the evaluation criteria for these.
>
> -Carlton
>
>
> ==============================
> Carlton A Samuels
> Mobile: 876-818-1799
> Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround
> =============================
>
> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Vanda Scartezini <vanda at scartezini.org <mailto:vanda at scartezini.org>> wrote:
> I totally agree with Eduardo and Carlton. During the call the general idea to define objectives was to get more focus . My 3 suggestions written in the chat were:
>
> · projects to promote knowledge of ICANN,
>
> · projects to enlarge DNS industry reaching less developed markets
>
> · projects to improve technical knowledge
>
> best regards
>
> here this Sunday will be Mothers’ day
>
> Here my tribute to all mothers in your lives!
>
> <image001.png>
>
>
>
> Vanda Scartezini
>
> Polo Consultores Associados
>
> Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004
>
> 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
>
> Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 <tel:+55%2011%203266-6253>
> Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 <tel:+55%2011%2098181-1464>
>
> Sorry for any typos.
>
> HAPPY 2017!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels at gmail.com <mailto:carlton.samuels at gmail.com>>
> Date: Friday, May 12, 2017 at 3:02 PM
> To: Eduardo Diaz <eduardodiazrivera at gmail.com <mailto:eduardodiazrivera at gmail.com>>
> Cc: Vanda Scartezini <vanda at scartezini.org <mailto:vanda at scartezini.org>>, 'At-Large Worldwide' <at-large at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:at-large at atlarge-lists.icann.org>>
> Subject: Re: [At-Large] Auction Proceeds - where we are and what you can help
>
>
>
> I like Ed's outline +1.
>
>
>
> Would only add that In my view, we already have the framework of interpretation of ICANN's role! A lot of time and effort already expended defining that for the IANA Transition kerfuffle from which emerged this Empowered Community Model.
>
>
>
> Let's resist the inclination to go invent a new wheel
>
>
>
> -Carlton
>
>
>
>
> ==============================
> Carlton A Samuels
> Mobile: 876-818-1799 <tel:(876)%20818-1799>
> Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround
> =============================
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Eduardo Diaz <eduardodiazrivera at gmail.com <mailto:eduardodiazrivera at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Vanda:
>
>
>
> My comments in RED.
>
>
>
> -ed
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 10:48 AM Vanda Scartezini <vanda at scartezini.org <mailto:vanda at scartezini.org>> wrote:
>
> Dear colleagues ( Español abajo)
>
>
>
> Auction Proceed CCWG is the group dealing with the process that shall be follow for the financial resources from new gTLDs auctions as you remember.
>
> We are in the phase of Auction Proceeds CCWG where we need to focus on to relevant points that your ideas will be very welcome. See below the question and if you can comment I appreciate.
>
> We are organizing a framework for this work,
>
>
>
> · As part of this framework, what will be the limitations of fund allocation, factoring in that the funds need to be used in line with ICANN’s mission while at the same time recognizing the diversity of communities that ICANN serves? This should include recommendations on how to assess whether the proposed use is aligned with ICANN’s Mission. Furthermore consideration is expected to be given to what safeguards, if any, need to be in place.
>
>
>
> There should not be a limitation of fund allocations. However, you can use a series of tiers. FOr example:
>
>
>
> Tier 1: $X - $Y
>
> Tier 2: $Y+1 $#Z
>
>
>
> and so forth.
>
>
>
> For each tier there should be different requiuerements. These requirements should be more stringent as the $$ amount increases.
>
>
>
> Create a framework of interpretation around ICANN missions to help identify and guide if the money to be allocated is or is not in concordance with ICANN Mission. Such a framework is important to standarize the allocation process. A series of stress tests models should be created to validate the allocation
>
>
>
> For example, it will be a requierement that for a $1,000,000 allocation (the amount is just for illustration purposes only) the community has to be involved in the final decision.
>
>
>
> · What aspects should be considered to define a timeframe, if any, for the funds allocation mechanism to operate as well as the disbursements of funds? E.g. The timeframe for the operation of this new mechanism may provide the opportunity for long term support, or for funding to be released in tranches linked to milestone achievements, single or multiple disbursements.
>
>
>
> 1. Determine fund allocation: 90 days max.
>
> 2. Allocate 30% funds at approval time
>
> 3. Disburse 40$% of the allocation using specific milestones for the duration of the project
>
> 4. Disburse the last 30% at completion
>
>
>
> Use the aboe as a guideline and put a process in place to work with exceptions to the guideline.
>
>
>
> Please feel free to enter in contact for any questions, comments etc.
>
> Appreciate
>
>
>
>
>
> Estimados colegas
>
>
>
> El grupo de procedimientos trabajando para definir cómo deben ser utilizados los recursos financieros advenidos de las subastas de new gTLDs, y estamos trabajando en la construcción de esta moldura.
>
>
>
> • Como parte de este marco, ¿cuáles serán las limitaciones de la asignación de fondos, teniendo en cuenta que los fondos deben ser utilizados en consonancia con la misión de ICANN y al mismo tiempo reconocer la diversidad de comunidades que ICANN sirve? Esto debería incluir recomendaciones sobre cómo evaluar si el uso propuesto está alineado con la Misión de ICANN. Además, se espera que se preste atención a las medidas de salvaguardia que deben aplicarse, en su caso.
>
>
>
> • ¿Qué aspectos deberían considerarse para definir un calendario, si existe alguno, para que el mecanismo de asignación de fondos funcione, así como los desembolsos de fondos? P.ej. El calendario para el funcionamiento de este nuevo mecanismo puede brindar la oportunidad de un apoyo a largo plazo, o de que la financiación se libere en tramos relacionados con logros de hitos, desembolsos únicos o múltiples.
>
>
>
> Por favor siéntanse libres para hacer comentarios o preguntas.
>
> Agradezco su participación.
>
>
>
> Vanda Scartezini
>
> Polo Consultores Associados
>
> Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004
>
> 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
>
> Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 <tel:+55%2011%203266-6253>
> Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 <tel:+55%2011%2098181-1464>
>
> Sorry for any typos.
>
> HAPPY 2017!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> At-Large mailing list
> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large <https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large>
>
> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org <http://atlarge.icann.org/>
>
> _______________________________________________
> At-Large mailing list
> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large <https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large>
>
> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org <http://atlarge.icann.org/>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> At-Large mailing list
> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
>
> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/at-large/attachments/20170512/cb697e4d/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the At-Large
mailing list