[At-Large] Unsubscribe me please

[Dev Anand Teelucksingh]

The At-Large Technology Taskforce are looking at group chat applications
https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Group+Chat - there a signup
link to a group chat server we are currently testing now.

Dev Anand




On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 4:06 AM, Rahul Srivastava via At-Large <
at-large at atlarge-lists.icann.org> wrote:

> Lets me contribute by proving some SOLUTION to this long debate of Mail
> issue.
>
> Certainly e-mails are just too old age technology to communicate within a
> large community. and to top of it when you allow everyone to send message
> to everyone it becomes too messy as it it right now since last two days.
>
> Messenger application is a better choice. However the most popular
> messaging platform whatsapp doesn’t offer any business solution. whatsapp
> group is certainly not what we can opt for reason being its group size of
> only 256 members and privacy issues that may arise from exposing mobile
> number of all members to everyone.
>
> There are few well know messaging platform like JioChat and wechat which
> let business and organisation create official channel. it let channel owner
> send message to each one follower and if a follower replies its visible
> only to channel owner. the channel owner can choose to distribute this
> response agin to all the followers.
>
> Best part is user's personal details like mobile number and e-mail is
> never exposed to anyone and these services comes with no cost.
>
> Regards
> rahul
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Vanda Scartezini <vanda at scartezini.org>
> *To:* Holly Raiche <h.raiche at internode.on.net>
> *Cc:* "at-large at atlarge-lists.icann.org" <at-large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> >
> *Sent:* Monday, 20 February 2017 4:18 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [At-Large] Unsubscribe me please
>
> Agree Holly
> People are more and more focusing on instant messages but discuss several
> points become difficult using just Whattsapp like communications.
> There are some unnecessary emails we could avoid but as per example votes-
> we can do better using appropriate tools but do no means we shall ignore
> the relevance of discussion lists
>
> Vanda Scartezini
> Sent from my iPhone
> Sorry for typos
>
> On 19 Feb 2017, at 18:04, Holly Raiche <h.raiche at internode.on.net> wrote:
>
> Hi Garth
>
> That isn’t sarcastic - it’s sad.  I am not talking about a big grand
> plan.  I am talking about a discussion on the lists - what are they, who
> uses them, is there a better way.  It could be a simple as eliminating one
> of the lists, or better labelling the lists, or simply putting a better
> subject heading.  Please let’s not step away from what may be small reforms
> because we have decided it is all too hard, and ICANN will can it.
>
> Holly
> On 20 Feb 2017, at 7:58 am, Gbruen <gbruen at knujon.com> wrote:
>
> Holly,
>
> This is going to sound sarcastic but it is simply factual. Me, Seun, and
> everyone else could collaborate and come up with a great plan and as soon
> as we try to move forward it will be taken over by some icann division and
> either get shelved, bloated, or made ineffective. This has already happened
> several time before with too many at-large projects.
>
> -Garth
>
>
> *Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Droid*
> On Feb 19, 2017 2:34 PM, Holly Raiche <h.raiche at internode.on.net> wrote:
>
> Folks
>
> A great discussion on this list - making some really important points.  So
> instead of letting the matter drop (as is so often the case), make this an
> item for discussion at CPH - and allow plenty of time.  How do we
> communicate, can we do better and how.
>
> So maybe review what some of us know - what are the lists, how are they
> used (or not), when people unsubscribe, do we try to find out why, is there
> a better way to communicate - by topic?  And Dev, Garth, Seun and everyone
> - could there be a page or so - to that list and staff, saying this is a
> better way and this is how to do it.
>
> We are starting the Review comments - and how we communicate (and how we
> could do it better) is clearly something that should be one of the  top
> items on that agenda.  So let’s actually make our communications structures
> better rather than just complain
>
> Thanks everyone
>
> Holly
> On 20 Feb 2017, at 4:57 am, Roberto Gaetano <roberto_gaetano at hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Oh good, then we can agree.
> R
>
>
> *Da:* gbruen at knujon.com [mailto:gbruen at knujon.com <gbruen at knujon.com>]
> *Inviato:* domenica 19 febbraio 2017 18:55
> *A:* Roberto Gaetano
> *Cc:*  <at-large at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> At-Large mailing list
> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
>
> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> At-Large mailing list
> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
>
> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> At-Large mailing list
> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
>
> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/at-large/attachments/20170220/a6441fe4/attachment-0001.html>