[At-Large] R: CCWG Accountability WorkStream 2 Questions on ICANN Jurisdiction

[Roberto Gaetano]

Actually, I was thinking in terms of similar lines, but also wondering whether under the Trump administration the jurisdiction issue would not become worse.
R.


> -----Messaggio originale-----
> Da: at-large-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:at-large-
> bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] Per conto di Robert Guerra
> Inviato: martedì 7 febbraio 2017 15:02
> A: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
> Cc: ALAC Working List; At-Large Worldwide
> Oggetto: Re: [At-Large] CCWG Accountability WorkStream 2 Questions on
> ICANN Jurisdiction
> 
> I would hope that Cuban and Iranian internet users reply to this
> questionnaire.
> 
> regards
> 
> Robert
> 
> --
> Robert Guerra
> Twitter: twitter.com/netfreedom
> Email: rguerra at privaterra.org
> PGP Keys : https://keybase.io/rguerra
> 
> On 7 Feb 2017, at 6:35, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote:
> 
> > Dear colleagues,
> >
> > on the ICANN evolution working group's last call (
> > https://community.icann.org/x/F47RAw ) we had a very healthy
> > discussion on the topic of ICANN Jurisdiction which one of the CCWG
> > Accountability workstream 2 sub-groups is addressing. The sub-group
> > has sent out a short questionnaire to collect input from the
> > community. This is attached.
> >
> > The questions are:
> >
> > 1. Has your business, your privacy or your ability to use or purchase
> > domain name-related services been affected by ICANN's jurisdiction* in
> > any way?
> > If the answer is Yes, please describe specific cases, situations or
> > incidents, including the date, the parties involved, and links to any
> > relevant documents. Please note that “affected” may refer to positive
> > and/or negative effects.
> > 2. Has ICANN's jurisdiction* affected any dispute resolution process
> > or litigation related to domain names you have been involved in?
> > If the answer is Yes, please describe specific cases, situations or
> > incidents, including the date, the parties involved, and links to any
> > relevant documents. Please note that “affected” may refer to positive
> > and/or negative effects.
> > 3. Do you have copies of and/or links to any verifiable reports of
> > experiences of other parties that would be responsive to the questions
> > above? If the answer is yes, please provide these copies and/or links.
> > 4. a. Are you aware of any material, documented instance(s) where
> > ICANN has been unable to pursue its Mission because of its
> > jurisdiction?* If so, please provide documentation.
> > b. Are you aware of and able to document the existence of an
> > alternative jurisdiction where ICANN would not be so prevented from
> > pursuing its Mission? If so, please provide documentation.
> >
> > Please be so kind to let us know your answers.
> >
> > Kindest regards,
> >
> > Olivier
> > (for the At-Large ICANN evolution working group)
> > _______________________________________________
> > At-Large mailing list
> > At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
> >
> > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
> _______________________________________________
> At-Large mailing list
> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
> 
> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org