[At-Large] IGO names: is this worth war?

CW Mail mail at christopherwilkinson.eu
Sun Nov 6 20:31:37 UTC 2016

Good evening:

There are several issues of basic public interest that should in future be addressed by CCWGs and not by GNSO PDPs.
The Community should ensure the neutrality or the balance of the co-Chairs for those CCWG. ICANN staff should provide a neutral secretariat for the work of CCWGs.


On 06 Nov 2016, at 19:34, Johan Helsingius <julf at julf.com> wrote:

More information about the At-Large mailing list