[At-Large] Cruz' revenge

Tue Oct 4 21:41:49 UTC 2016

I am with Alberto here. 

Best, 

Vanda Scartezini

Polo Consultores Associados

Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004

01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil

Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253

Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 

Sorry for any typos. 

From: <at-large-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org> on behalf of "svg at milathan.ltd" <svg at milathan.ltd>
Date: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 at 9:49 AM
To: Alberto Soto <asoto at ibero-americano.org>
Cc: 'At-Large Worldwide' <at-large at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
Subject: Re: [At-Large] Cruz' revenge

+1 

Stéphane Van Gelder

Le 3 oct. 2016 à 20:12, Alberto Soto <asoto at ibero-americano.org> a écrit :

Hello. 

It is the first time that happened since the creation of ICANN. A quick risk analysis would say:

- That custody during transport is not for ICANN

- That duplication is not necessary

- There was a very quick response

- ICANN is working with transparency and accountability in solving critical problems, with costs adjusted as necessary to maintain the operation.

Kind regards

Alberto

De: at-large-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:at-large-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] En nombre de Seun Ojedeji
Enviado el: lunes, 03 de octubre de 2016 03:00 p.m.
Para: Roberto Gaetano <roberto_gaetano at hotmail.com>
CC: At-Large Worldwide <at-large at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
Asunto: Re: [At-Large] Cruz' revenge

Hello Roberto,

Please tell me the first question is "pun intended" ;-) As to the second; well I understand it's prudent to have backup of network services/data but what does having a backup of over 100 tons of hardware mean? I think it definitely will mean a lot of redundancy resulting to a waste of resources as well.

As I note from the announcement[1], looks like a number of the devices has been replaced. The remote hubs will be the major hit. I can imagine the ICANN tech are working around the logistics.

Regards
1. https://www.icann.org/news/blog/fire-on-cargo-ship-affects-it-equipment-bound-for-icann57-hyderabad

Sent from my LG G4
Kindly excuse brevity and typos

On 3 Oct 2016 18:21, "Roberto Gaetano" <roberto_gaetano at hotmail.com> wrote:

http://domainincite.com/21067-ship-explosion-takes-icann-gear-out-of-action

Two questions:

·         We always talk about disaster recovery, duplication of resources, etc. Why did we not put in place these measures? The question will now be “if those folks cannot secure their own equipment, how can they be trusted to take care of the Internet?”

·         What will be the real impact for the meeting? I cannot believe that we do not have backup solutions, as Murphy implies.

We live in interesting times indeed. Brings me back to 1998, when CORE servers were stolen.

Cheers,

R

_______________________________________________
At-Large mailing list
At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large

At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org

El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo electrónico en busca de virus. 
www.avast.com

_______________________________________________
At-Large mailing list
At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large

At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org

_______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/at-large/attachments/20161004/51895811/attachment-0001.html>