[At-Large] R: Cruz' revenge
roberto_gaetano at hotmail.com
Tue Oct 4 20:25:36 UTC 2016
Actually, I was not implying anything like that, I just asked some questions because I was seriously worried about the impact of this story on the general audience.
ICANN's note (https://www.icann.org/news/blog/fire-on-cargo-ship-affects-it-equipment-bound-for-icann57-hyderabad) is fully satisfactory to me.
> -----Messaggio originale-----
> Da: at-large-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:at-large-
> bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] Per conto di John R. Levine
> Inviato: martedì 4 ottobre 2016 17:09
> A: svg at milathan.ltd
> Cc: At-Large Worldwide
> Oggetto: Re: [At-Large] Cruz' revenge
> >> It is the first time that happened since the creation of ICANN. A
> >> quick risk analysis would say: <>
> >> - That custody during transport is not for ICANN
> >> - That duplication is not necessary
> >> - There was a very quick response
> >> - ICANN is working with transparency and accountability in solving critical
> problems, with costs adjusted as necessary to maintain the operation.
> Agreed. This is a very unusual problem, and ICANN is taking reasonable
> action to deal with it.
> Some of the people here appear to be suggesting that ICANN should have
> two or three sets of the 100 tons of stuff they send to meetings, or perhaps
> that they should run their own shipping line. I can promise that the Register
> would be full of stories about "A peek inside ICANN's million dollar
> warehouse of cables."
> John Levine, johnl at iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for
> Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail.
> https://jl.ly _______________________________________________
> At-Large mailing list
> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
More information about the At-Large