[At-Large] R: R: R: Is ICANN's oversight really moving away from the US government?

Maureen Hilyard maureen.hilyard at gmail.com
Sat Apr 9 20:18:26 UTC 2016


I got from Thomas's email that he proposes that we go outside of current
norms and create a multistakeholder treaty model that incorporates all our
stakeholder groups. Of course it doesn't exist now but we are in a
transition phase so perhaps its timely.


On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com>

> Dear Thomas,
> On 09/04/2016 20:51, Thomas Lowenhaupt wrote:
> >
> > Perhaps I'm missing something, but isn't Parminder's thought
> > bottom-up, and in-line with the multi-stakeholder concept? (And I see
> > some merit in his concerns about gTLD governance.)
> The Treaty Model which Parminder argues for requires signature from UN
> Member States.
> http://www.un.org/en/member-states/
> Where is Civil Society?
> Where are End Users?
> Where are the Technical & Academic Communities?
> Where is the Private Sector?
> Kindest regards,
> Olivier
> _______________________________________________
> At-Large mailing list
> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/at-large/attachments/20160409/baf8b49e/attachment.html>

More information about the At-Large mailing list