[At-Large] Fwd: [] Final Issue Report on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures

Evan Leibovitch evanleibovitch at gmail.com
Thu Dec 10 07:42:44 UTC 2015

Yup, Volkswagen owes its buyers nothing. Who needs any of this consumer protection nonsense anywhere? 


On Dec 10, 2015, 08:33, at 08:33, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
>On 09-Dec-15 17:56, Christopher Wilkinson wrote:
>> More generally, TLD policy should protect the Registrant. Apparently
>that is not part of the new gTLD deal. Or is it?
>To an extent.  Contractual conditions, consensus policies, predictable
>processes, adherence to the law.  We certainly need more privacy
>protection &c.  Some of us even want to go so far as to make sure the
>registrants' human rights are protected.
>Beyond that are registrants to be protected from all consequences of
>their purchasing choices?  Why?  If I pay money for something that
>out to be less that I hoped it would be, as so often happens, why
>I be protected from that?  Businesses fail.  And when they do, their
>loyal customers are affected as well.
>This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>At-Large mailing list
>At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/at-large/attachments/20151210/d56774a2/attachment.html>

More information about the At-Large mailing list